AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management SystemvsISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence
See exactly how AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls map to ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System maps to ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence with 18% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 61 AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls identifies 59 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 61 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 31 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Operation (Clause 8)(9 mappings)
Improvement(3 mappings)
Improvement (Clause 10)(8 mappings)
+11 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System comparisons
Other ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System and ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence?
AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System has 61 controls across its framework, while ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence covers 77 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation, where 11 AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls have no direct ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence equivalent.
How many controls map between AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System and ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence?
Of 61 total AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls, 13 map directly to ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 59 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System to ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence?
59 AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System and ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence?
The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.