APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk ManagementvsSOC 2
See exactly how APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls map to SOC 2. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which SOC 2 controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management maps to SOC 2 with 88% coverage across 38 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 43 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls identifies 5 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Regulatory.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 43 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 57 mapped controls across 10 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
Operational Risk Management Framework(20 mappings)
+37 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management to SOC 2 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which SOC 2 controls your existing APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management into SOC 2 lands at 31.1%, while SOC 2 into APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management lands at 48.8%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management evidence buys you for SOC 2, the other asks the reverse.
19 of 61 SOC 2 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management. 42 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Technology capability must meet current and projected business requirements.
Grounded in CPS230-P25 Information and Technology Capability and Asset Health. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Authorizes, designs, develops or acquires, implements, operates, approves, maintains, and monitors environmental protections, software, data back-up processes, and recovery infrastructure to meet its objectives
Every one of the 19 evidenced controls and 42 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
21 of 43 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls are evidenced by work you have already done for SOC 2. 22 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Entity wide risk identification and analysis is operational risk identification and assessment.
Grounded in SOC2-CC3.2 COSO principle 7: Identifies risks and analyzes to determine how managed. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
The entity must effectively manage its operational risks and set and maintain appropriate standards for conduct and compliance, hold its critical operations within tolerance levels through severe disruption, and manage the risks arising...
Every one of the 21 evidenced controls and 22 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 88% in the header counts how many APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many SOC 2 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management comparisons
Other SOC 2 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and SOC 2?
APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management has 43 controls across its framework, while SOC 2 covers 61 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 38 overlapping controls (88% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Regulatory, where 2 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct SOC 2 equivalent.
How many controls map between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and SOC 2?
Of 43 total APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls, 38 map directly to SOC 2 controls, representing 88% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management to SOC 2?
5 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct equivalent in SOC 2. The highest concentration of gaps is in Regulatory with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and SOC 2?
The domain with the highest gap count is Regulatory (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.