Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk ManagementvsSOC 2

See exactly how APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls map to SOC 2. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

57
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
88%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which SOC 2 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management maps to SOC 2 with 88% coverage across 38 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 43 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls identifies 5 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Regulatory.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 43 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 57 mapped controls across 10 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.

Operational Risk Management Framework(20 mappings)

CPS230-11Identification, Assessment and Management of Operational Risk
→SOC2-CC3.2CC3.2 Identifying and analysing risks to objectives (COSO principle 7)
CPS230-13Board Accountability for Operational Risk Management3 targets
→SOC2-CC1.2CC1.2 Board independence and oversight of internal control (COSO principle 2)
→SOC2-CC7.4CC7.4 Responding to security incidents
→SOC2-CC7.5CC7.5 Recovering from security incidents
CPS230-14Board Setting of Senior Manager Roles and Responsibilities4 targets
→SOC2-CC1.3CC1.3 Structures, reporting lines, authorities and responsibilities (COSO principle 3)
→SOC2-CC1.4CC1.4 Attracting, developing and retaining competent people (COSO principle 4)
→SOC2-CC1.5CC1.5 Accountability for internal control responsibilities (COSO principle 5)
→SOC2-CC2.2CC2.2 Internal communication of objectives and control responsibilities (COSO principle 14)
CPS230-15Operational Risk Elements of the Risk Management Framework3 targets
→SOC2-CC3.1CC3.1 Objectives specified clearly enough to assess risk (COSO principle 6)
→SOC2-CC5.1CC5.1 Selecting control activities that mitigate risk (COSO principle 10)
→SOC2-CC5.3CC5.3 Deploying controls through policies and procedures (COSO principle 12)
CPS230-16Internal Audit Review of the Business Continuity Plan
→SOC2-CC4.1CC4.1 Ongoing and separate evaluations of control (COSO principle 16)
CPS230-8Board Oversight, Approval of the BCP, Tolerance Levels and Service Provider Policy
→SOC2-CC1.2CC1.2 Board independence and oversight of internal control (COSO principle 2)
CPS230-9Management of the Full Range of Operational Risks3 targets
→SOC2-CC1.3CC1.3 Structures, reporting lines, authorities and responsibilities (COSO principle 3)
→SOC2-CC3.2CC3.2 Identifying and analysing risks to objectives (COSO principle 7)
→SOC2-CC8.1CC8.1 Managing changes to procedures, software, data and infrastructure
CPS230-P12Key Principles for Operational Risk, Resilience and Service Providers2 targets
→SOC2-CC1.1CC1.1 Commitment to integrity and ethical values (COSO principle 1)
→SOC2-CC9.1CC9.1 Mitigating risks of business disruption
CPS230-P18Integration with the Risk Management Framework and Recovery Planning
→SOC2-CC9.1CC9.1 Mitigating risks of business disruption
CPS230-P26Assessment of Business and Strategic Decisions on the Risk Profile
→SOC2-CC3.4CC3.4 Identifying and assessing significant changes (COSO principle 9)

+37 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management to SOC 2 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which SOC 2 controls your existing APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management into SOC 2 lands at 31.1%, while SOC 2 into APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management lands at 48.8%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management evidence buys you for SOC 2, the other asks the reverse.

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management into SOC 2
31.1%

19 of 61 SOC 2 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management. 42 are genuine gaps.

SOC 2 into APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management
48.8%

21 of 43 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls are evidenced by work you have already done for SOC 2. 22 are genuine gaps.

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management to SOC 2
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 88% in the header counts how many APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many SOC 2 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 868 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and SOC 2?

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management has 43 controls across its framework, while SOC 2 covers 61 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 38 overlapping controls (88% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Regulatory, where 2 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct SOC 2 equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and SOC 2?

Of 43 total APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls, 38 map directly to SOC 2 controls, representing 88% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management to SOC 2?

5 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct equivalent in SOC 2. The highest concentration of gaps is in Regulatory with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and SOC 2?

The domain with the highest gap count is Regulatory (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.