Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk ManagementvsFedRAMP Moderate

See exactly how APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls map to FedRAMP Moderate. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

78
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
93%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which FedRAMP Moderate controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management maps to FedRAMP Moderate with 93% coverage across 40 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 43 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls identifies 3 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Operational Risk Management Framework.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 43 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 78 mapped controls across 10 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Operational Risk Management Framework(18 mappings)

CPS230-11Identification, Assessment and Management of Operational Risk3 targets
IR-2Incident Response Training
RA-1Policy and Procedures
RA-3Risk Assessment
CPS230-13Board Accountability for Operational Risk Management
CA-6Authorization
CPS230-14Board Setting of Senior Manager Roles and Responsibilities
PS-9Position Descriptions. Incorporate security and privacy roles and responsibilities into organizational position descriptions
CPS230-15Operational Risk Elements of the Risk Management Framework
RA-1Policy and Procedures
CPS230-16Internal Audit Review of the Business Continuity Plan
CA-2Control Assessments
CPS230-8Board Oversight, Approval of the BCP, Tolerance Levels and Service Provider Policy2 targets
CP-1Policy and Procedures
CP-2Contingency Plan
CPS230-9Management of the Full Range of Operational Risks
RA-3Risk Assessment
CPS230-P26Assessment of Business and Strategic Decisions on the Risk Profile2 targets
CM-4Impact Analyses
RA-3Risk Assessment
CPS230-P27Comprehensive Assessment of the Operational Risk Profile4 targets
CA-7Continuous Monitoring
PL-2System Security and Privacy Plans
RA-3Risk Assessment
RA-9Criticality Analysis. Identify critical system components and functions by performing a criticality analysis for [Assignment: organization-defined systems, system components, or system services] at [Assignment: organization-defined decision points in the system development life cycle]
CPS230-P28Risk Assessment Before Providing a Material Service to Another Party2 targets
CA-6Authorization
RA-3Risk Assessment

Critical Operations(2 mappings)

CPS230-17Mandatory Minimum Classification of Critical Operations2 targets
CP-2(8)Contingency Plan | Identify Critical Assets. Identify critical system assets supporting [Selection: all; essential] mission and business functions
RA-9Criticality Analysis. Identify critical system components and functions by performing a criticality analysis for [Assignment: organization-defined systems, system components, or system services] at [Assignment: organization-defined decision points in the system development life cycle]

+58 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management to FedRAMP Moderate crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which FedRAMP Moderate controls your existing APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management into FedRAMP Moderate lands at 7.7%, while FedRAMP Moderate into APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management lands at 55.8%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management evidence buys you for FedRAMP Moderate, the other asks the reverse.

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management into FedRAMP Moderate
7.7%

25 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls are evidenced by work you have already done for APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management. 298 are genuine gaps.

50%SR - Supply Chain Risk Management
17.4%CP - Contingency Planning
23.5%IR - Incident Response
36.4%RA - Risk Assessment
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 39 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: CA-2 Control Assessments

Controls must be monitored, reviewed and tested for design and operating effectiveness.

Grounded in CPS230-P30 Monitoring, Review and Testing of Control Effectiveness. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: AC-1 Policy and Procedures

Develop and disseminate access control policy and procedures; review at least annually (FedRAMP parameter); update following defined events.

Every one of the 25 evidenced controls and 298 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

FedRAMP Moderate into APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management
55.8%

24 of 43 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls are evidenced by work you have already done for FedRAMP Moderate. 19 are genuine gaps.

70%Service Provider Management
85.7%Business Continuity
33.3%Operational Risk Management Framework
75%Critical Operations
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 58 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: CPS 230 para 13 Identification, Assessment and Management of Operational Risk

FedRAMP fixes annual risk assessment identifying threats, likelihood and harm.

Grounded in RA-3 Risk Assessment. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: CPS 230 para 12 Key Principles for Operational Risk, Resilience and Service Providers

The entity must effectively manage its operational risks and set and maintain appropriate standards for conduct and compliance, hold its critical operations within tolerance levels through severe disruption, and manage the risks arising...

Every one of the 24 evidenced controls and 19 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management to FedRAMP Moderate
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 93% in the header counts how many APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many FedRAMP Moderate controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and FedRAMP Moderate?

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management has 43 controls across its framework, while FedRAMP Moderate covers 323 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 40 overlapping controls (93% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operational Risk Management Framework, where 2 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct FedRAMP Moderate equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and FedRAMP Moderate?

Of 43 total APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls, 40 map directly to FedRAMP Moderate controls, representing 93% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management to FedRAMP Moderate?

3 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct equivalent in FedRAMP Moderate. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operational Risk Management Framework with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and FedRAMP Moderate?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operational Risk Management Framework (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.