Cross-Framework Mapping

Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)vsAML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)

See exactly how Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) controls map to AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
18
Gaps Found
23%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) maps to AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) with 23% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Assessment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Risk Assessment(9 mappings)

DMF-4.1Impact Assessment
AMLCTF-PartA-RiskAssessML/TF Risk Assessment
DMF-4.3Regulatory Risk Assessment
AMLCTF-PartA-RiskAssessML/TF Risk Assessment
RA-1Security Risk Assessment
AMLCTF-PartA-RiskAssessML/TF Risk Assessment
RA-2Human Rights Risk Identification3 targets
MSA-13Mandatory Reporting Obligation
MSA-14Joint Statements
MSA-15Voluntary Statements
RA-4Rule of Law Assessment3 targets
MSA-13Mandatory Reporting Obligation
MSA-14Joint Statements
MSA-15Voluntary Statements

Implementation and Governance(4 mappings)

IG-1Annual Reporting
MSA-13Mandatory Reporting Obligation
IG-4Incident Response3 targets
MSA-13Mandatory Reporting Obligation
MSA-14Joint Statements
MSA-15Voluntary Statements

Related Comparisons

Other Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) comparisons

Other AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)?

Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) has 31 controls across its framework, while AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (23% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Assessment, where 8 Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) controls have no direct AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) equivalent.

How many controls map between Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)?

Of 31 total Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) controls, 7 map directly to AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls — representing 23% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) to AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)?

24 Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) controls have no direct equivalent in AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia). The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Assessment with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Assessment (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.