TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience RequirementsvsSSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)

See exactly how UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls map to SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
20
Gaps Found
28%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements maps to SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) with 28% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 29 UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in RTS Section 4 — Security Requirements (Technological Controls).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 29 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

RTS Section 1 — Introduction and Scope(1 mappings)

RTS 1.1Scope of technical standards
→RM-3Monitoring of Controls

RTS Section 4 — Security Requirements (People Controls)(1 mappings)

RTS 4.10Security event reporting
→RM-3Monitoring of Controls

RTS Section 4 — Security Requirements (Physical Controls)(1 mappings)

RTS 4.11Equipment protection
→ITGC-5Physical and Environmental Security

RTS Section 4 — Security Requirements (Technological Controls)(4 mappings)

RTS 4.15Privileged access management2 targets
→ITGC-1Logical Access Controls
→ITGC-4Program Development
RTS 4.18Backup and recovery
→ITGC-3Computer Operations
RTS 4.21Secure development and change management
→ITGC-2Change Management

RTS Section 4 — Security Requirements (Organisational Controls)(2 mappings)

RTS 4.2Organisation of information security
→RM-3Monitoring of Controls
RTS 4.3Access management and identity controls
→ITGC-1Logical Access Controls

Related Comparisons

Other UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements comparisons

UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security17 mappingsUK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)17 mappingsUK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange17 mappingsUK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)15 mappingsUK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)15 mappingsUK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsUK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements vs PCI DSS v4.015 mappingsUK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappings

Other SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) comparisons

SSAE 18 — Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) vs SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)8 mappingsUS ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security vs SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)6 mappingsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)6 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)6 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)6 mappingsSOC 2 vs SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)6 mappingsNotifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia) vs SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)5 mappingsEU Digital Markets Act vs SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements and SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)?

UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements has 29 controls across its framework, while SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) covers 27 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (28% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in RTS Section 4 — Security Requirements (Technological Controls), where 6 UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls have no direct SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) equivalent.

How many controls map between UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements and SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)?

Of 29 total UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls, 8 map directly to SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) controls — representing 28% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements to SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)?

21 UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR). The highest concentration of gaps is in RTS Section 4 — Security Requirements (Technological Controls) with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements and SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)?

The domain with the highest gap count is RTS Section 4 — Security Requirements (Technological Controls) (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.