Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT SecurityvsSSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)

See exactly how NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls map to SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
12
Gaps Found
33%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security maps to SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) with 33% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in OT Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

OT Security Controls(6 mappings)

NIST82-CTL-01OT Access Control3 targets
ITGC-1Logical Access Controls
ITGC-4Program Development
ITGC-5Physical and Environmental Security
NIST82-CTL-03OT Audit and Monitoring
ITGC-2Change Management
NIST82-CTL-05OT Configuration Management
ITGC-2Change Management
NIST82-CTL-07OT Backup and Recovery
ITGC-3Computer Operations

OT Incident Response(2 mappings)

NIST82-IR-03OT Incident Containment
RM-3Monitoring of Controls
NIST82-IR-04OT System Recovery
ITGC-3Computer Operations

OT Risk Management(1 mappings)

NIST82-RM-02OT Security Program Management
RM-3Monitoring of Controls

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security comparisons

Other SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)?

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security has 21 controls across its framework, while SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) covers 27 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (33% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in OT Risk Management, where 4 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls have no direct SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)?

Of 21 total NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls, 7 map directly to SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) controls — representing 33% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security to SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)?

14 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls have no direct equivalent in SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR). The highest concentration of gaps is in OT Risk Management with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)?

The domain with the highest gap count is OT Risk Management (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.