Cross-Framework Mapping

UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience RequirementsvsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

30
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
52%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 52% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 29 UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Annual Security Audit Requirements.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 29 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 30 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

RTS Section 1 — Introduction and Scope(3 mappings)

RTS 1.1Scope of technical standards3 targets
3.3Record Completion and Maintenance
FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup

RTS Section 4 — Security Requirements (People Controls)(5 mappings)

RTS 4.10Security event reporting3 targets
3.3Record Completion and Maintenance
FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
RTS 4.7Security awareness training
3.2.1Security Awareness Assessment
RTS 4.8Employment screening and termination
3.9Personnel Security

RTS Section 4 — Security Requirements (Physical Controls)(1 mappings)

RTS 4.11Equipment protection
3.10Physical and Environmental Protection

RTS Section 4 — Security Requirements (Technological Controls)(11 mappings)

RTS 4.15Privileged access management2 targets
3.10Physical and Environmental Protection
3.7.1Multi-Factor Authentication Assessment
RTS 4.16Authentication mechanisms2 targets
3.7Identification and Authentication
3.7.1Multi-Factor Authentication Assessment
RTS 4.18Backup and recovery2 targets
3.6Incident Response
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
RTS 4.19Logging and monitoring2 targets
3.12Security Assessment and Monitoring
3.3.1Audit Event Assessment
RTS 4.20Cryptography3 targets
FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection
FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest
FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity

+10 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements has 29 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (52% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Annual Security Audit Requirements, where 4 UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 29 total UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls, 15 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 52% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

14 UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Annual Security Audit Requirements with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Annual Security Audit Requirements (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.