Cross-Framework Mapping

US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data SecurityvsSSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)

See exactly how US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security controls map to SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
35
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security maps to SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) with 10% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 41 US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Compliance and Enforcement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 41 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Compliance and Enforcement(5 mappings)

US-ITAR-EAR-CE-03Penalties
ITGC-4Program Development
US-SEC-DA-CE-01Platform Compliance3 targets
CE-1Organizational Structure
CE-4Management Oversight
RM-1Financial Reporting Accuracy
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting
RM-3Monitoring of Controls

Data Security Requirements(1 mappings)

US-ITAR-EAR-DS-03Access Controls
ITGC-1Logical Access Controls

Related Comparisons

Other US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security comparisons

Other SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security and SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)?

US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security has 41 controls across its framework, while SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) covers 27 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Compliance and Enforcement, where 35 US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security controls have no direct SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) equivalent.

How many controls map between US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security and SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)?

Of 41 total US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security controls, 4 map directly to SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security to SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)?

37 US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security controls have no direct equivalent in SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR). The highest concentration of gaps is in Compliance and Enforcement with 35 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security and SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Compliance and Enforcement (35 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.