UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience RequirementsvsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security
See exactly how UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls map to NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements maps to NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security with 59% coverage across 17 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 29 UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls identifies 12 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Annual Security Audit Requirements.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 29 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 27 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
RTS Section 1 — Introduction and Scope(2 mappings)
RTS Section 4 — Security Requirements (People Controls)(3 mappings)
RTS Section 4 — Security Requirements (Physical Controls)(1 mappings)
RTS Section 4 — Security Requirements (Technological Controls)(14 mappings)
+7 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements and NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security?
UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements has 29 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 17 overlapping controls (59% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Annual Security Audit Requirements, where 4 UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls have no direct NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security equivalent.
How many controls map between UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements and NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security?
Of 29 total UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls, 17 map directly to NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls — representing 59% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements to NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security?
12 UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in Annual Security Audit Requirements with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements and NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security?
The domain with the highest gap count is Annual Security Audit Requirements (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.