Cross-Framework Mapping

SOC 2vsSSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)

See exactly how SOC 2 controls map to SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
45
Gaps Found
15%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SOC 2 maps to SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) with 15% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 54 SOC 2 controls identifies 46 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in CC - Common Criteria (Security).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 54 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

A - Availability(2 mappings)

SOC2-A1.2Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability
ITGC-3Computer Operations
SOC2-A1.3Recovery plan procedures support system recovery from failures
ITGC-3Computer Operations

CC - Common Criteria (Security)(7 mappings)

SOC2-CC4.2COSO principle 17: Evaluates and communicates deficiencies in a timely manner
RM-3Monitoring of Controls
SOC2-CC6.1Logical and physical access security for information and assets
ITGC-5Physical and Environmental Security
SOC2-CC6.2Prior to granting access, registration and authorization processes are established
ITGC-4Program Development
SOC2-CC6.3Role-based access and least privilege are enforced2 targets
ITGC-1Logical Access Controls
ITGC-4Program Development
SOC2-CC7.4Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures
RM-3Monitoring of Controls
SOC2-CC8.1Change management processes are in place
ITGC-2Change Management

Related Comparisons

Other SOC 2 comparisons

Other SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between SOC 2 and SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)?

SOC 2 has 54 controls across its framework, while SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) covers 27 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CC - Common Criteria (Security), where 25 SOC 2 controls have no direct SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) equivalent.

How many controls map between SOC 2 and SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)?

Of 54 total SOC 2 controls, 8 map directly to SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 46 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SOC 2 to SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)?

46 SOC 2 controls have no direct equivalent in SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR). The highest concentration of gaps is in CC - Common Criteria (Security) with 25 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SOC 2 and SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)?

The domain with the highest gap count is CC - Common Criteria (Security) (25 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.