TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience RequirementsvsPCI DSS v4.0

See exactly how UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls map to PCI DSS v4.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

39
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
52%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements maps to PCI DSS v4.0 with 52% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 29 UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Annual Security Audit Requirements.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 29 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 39 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

RTS Section 1 — Introduction and Scope(3 mappings)

RTS 1.1Scope of technical standards3 targets
→PCI-10.1Processes for logging and monitoring access are defined and understood
→PCI-5.1Processes for protecting against malicious software are defined and understood
→PCI-6.1Processes for developing secure systems and software are defined and understood

RTS Section 4 — Security Requirements (People Controls)(5 mappings)

RTS 4.10Security event reporting3 targets
→PCI-10.1Processes for logging and monitoring access are defined and understood
→PCI-5.1Processes for protecting against malicious software are defined and understood
→PCI-6.1Processes for developing secure systems and software are defined and understood
RTS 4.7Security awareness training2 targets
→PCI-12.6Security awareness education is an ongoing activity
→PCI-5.4Anti-phishing mechanisms protect users against phishing attacks

RTS Section 4 — Security Requirements (Physical Controls)(3 mappings)

RTS 4.11Equipment protection3 targets
→PCI-9.1Processes for restricting physical access to cardholder data are defined
→PCI-9.2Physical access controls manage entry into facilities with cardholder data
→PCI-9.4Media with cardholder data is securely stored, accessed, distributed, and destroyed

RTS Section 4 — Security Requirements (Technological Controls)(9 mappings)

RTS 4.14User device and endpoint security
→PCI-5.3Anti-malware mechanisms and processes are active, maintained, and monitored
RTS 4.15Privileged access management3 targets
→PCI-3.3Sensitive authentication data is not stored after authorization
→PCI-7.3Access to system components and data is managed via an access control system
→PCI-9.2Physical access controls manage entry into facilities with cardholder data
RTS 4.16Authentication mechanisms3 targets
→PCI-3.3Sensitive authentication data is not stored after authorization
→PCI-8.1Processes for identification and authentication are defined and understood
→PCI-8.4Multi-factor authentication is implemented for access into the CDE
RTS 4.17Malware protection2 targets
→PCI-5.2Malicious software is prevented or detected and addressed
→PCI-5.3Anti-malware mechanisms and processes are active, maintained, and monitored

+19 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements comparisons

UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security17 mappingsUK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)17 mappingsUK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange17 mappingsUK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)15 mappingsUK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)15 mappingsUK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsUK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappingsUK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management15 mappings

Other PCI DSS v4.0 comparisons

ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs PCI DSS v4.028 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs PCI DSS v4.027 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs PCI DSS v4.027 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs PCI DSS v4.026 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs PCI DSS v4.026 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs PCI DSS v4.026 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs PCI DSS v4.026 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs PCI DSS v4.026 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements and PCI DSS v4.0?

UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements has 29 controls across its framework, while PCI DSS v4.0 covers 63 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (52% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Annual Security Audit Requirements, where 4 UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls have no direct PCI DSS v4.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements and PCI DSS v4.0?

Of 29 total UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls, 15 map directly to PCI DSS v4.0 controls — representing 52% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements to PCI DSS v4.0?

14 UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in PCI DSS v4.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Annual Security Audit Requirements with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements and PCI DSS v4.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Annual Security Audit Requirements (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.