Cross-Framework Mapping

SOC 2vsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)

See exactly how SOC 2 controls map to South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

21
Controls Mapped
33
Gaps Found
22%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SOC 2 maps to South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) with 22% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 54 SOC 2 controls identifies 42 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in CC - Common Criteria (Security).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 54 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 21 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

A - Availability(3 mappings)

SOC2-A1.1Maintains capacity to meet availability commitments
CERT-1RRA Certification to EPA
SOC2-A1.2Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability
CERT-1RRA Certification to EPA
SOC2-A1.3Recovery plan procedures support system recovery from failures
CERT-1RRA Certification to EPA

CC - Common Criteria (Security)(15 mappings)

SOC2-CC4.2COSO principle 17: Evaluates and communicates deficiencies in a timely manner
NRC73-CTL-01Access Control for CDAs
SOC2-CC6.1Logical and physical access security for information and assets
KR-CSAP-SC-02Infrastructure and Network Security
SOC2-CC6.3Role-based access and least privilege are enforced3 targets
CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue
MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection
PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls
SOC2-CC7.4Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures5 targets
CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue
KR-CSAP-CC-03Incident Reporting
KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management
NRC73-CTL-01Access Control for CDAs
PAS1192-5-SC-03Breach Management
SOC2-CC7.5Identifies the root cause of security incidents4 targets
CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue
KR-CSAP-CC-03Incident Reporting
KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management
PAS1192-5-SC-03Breach Management
SOC2-CC8.1Change management processes are in place
NRC73-CTL-03Configuration Management

P - Privacy(2 mappings)

SOC2-P3.1Personal information is collected consistent with privacy commitments
MARSE-SC-01NIST 800-53 Moderate Baseline
SOC2-P4.3Personal information is securely disposed of
MARSE-SC-01NIST 800-53 Moderate Baseline

+1 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between SOC 2 and South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)?

SOC 2 has 54 controls across its framework, while South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (22% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CC - Common Criteria (Security), where 25 SOC 2 controls have no direct South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) equivalent.

How many controls map between SOC 2 and South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)?

Of 54 total SOC 2 controls, 12 map directly to South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) controls — representing 22% coverage. The remaining 42 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SOC 2 to South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)?

42 SOC 2 controls have no direct equivalent in South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP). The highest concentration of gaps is in CC - Common Criteria (Security) with 25 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SOC 2 and South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)?

The domain with the highest gap count is CC - Common Criteria (Security) (25 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.