TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

SOC 2vsFedRAMP Rev 5

See exactly how SOC 2 controls map to FedRAMP Rev 5. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

46
Controls Mapped
8
Gaps Found
20%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SOC 2 maps to FedRAMP Rev 5 with 20% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 54 SOC 2 controls identifies 43 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in CC - Common Criteria (Security).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 54 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 46 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

A - Availability(4 mappings)

SOC2-A1.2Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability2 targets
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
→FEDRAMP-IR-4Incident Handling
SOC2-A1.3Recovery plan procedures support system recovery from failures2 targets
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
→FEDRAMP-IR-4Incident Handling

CC - Common Criteria (Security)(16 mappings)

SOC2-CC4.2COSO principle 17: Evaluates and communicates deficiencies in a timely manner7 targets
→FEDRAMP-AC-1Access Control Policy and Procedures
→FEDRAMP-AC-2Account Management
→FEDRAMP-AU-2Event Logging
→FEDRAMP-AU-6Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting
→FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
→FEDRAMP-RA-5Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning
SOC2-CC6.1Logical and physical access security for information and assets4 targets
→3.10Physical and Environmental Protection
→FEDRAMP-PE-3Physical Access Control
→FEDRAMP-PE-6Monitoring Physical Access
→ICS-AC-4Physical access controls
SOC2-CC6.2Prior to granting access, registration and authorization processes are established5 targets
→FEDRAMP-CA-1Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring Policy
→FEDRAMP-PE-3Physical Access Control
→ICS-AC-1Role-based access control
→ICS-AC-3Account management
→NIS2-IA-11Access Control Policy

+26 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other SOC 2 comparisons

SOC 2 vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange13 mappingsSOC 2 vs SSAE 18 — Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)13 mappingsSOC 2 vs ISO 27001:202212 mappingsSOC 2 vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)12 mappingsSOC 2 vs CSA CCM v411 mappingsSOC 2 vs EU Digital Markets Act11 mappingsSOC 2 vs Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR)11 mappingsSOC 2 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)11 mappings

Other FedRAMP Rev 5 comparisons

South Korea ISMS-P vs FedRAMP Rev 537 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs FedRAMP Rev 535 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs FedRAMP Rev 535 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs FedRAMP Rev 534 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs FedRAMP Rev 534 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs FedRAMP Rev 533 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs FedRAMP Rev 533 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs FedRAMP Rev 533 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between SOC 2 and FedRAMP Rev 5?

SOC 2 has 54 controls across its framework, while FedRAMP Rev 5 covers 64 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CC - Common Criteria (Security), where 25 SOC 2 controls have no direct FedRAMP Rev 5 equivalent.

How many controls map between SOC 2 and FedRAMP Rev 5?

Of 54 total SOC 2 controls, 11 map directly to FedRAMP Rev 5 controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 43 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SOC 2 to FedRAMP Rev 5?

43 SOC 2 controls have no direct equivalent in FedRAMP Rev 5. The highest concentration of gaps is in CC - Common Criteria (Security) with 25 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SOC 2 and FedRAMP Rev 5?

The domain with the highest gap count is CC - Common Criteria (Security) (25 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.