Cross-Framework Mapping

SOC 2vsCSA CCM v4

See exactly how SOC 2 controls map to CSA CCM v4. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

38
Controls Mapped
16
Gaps Found
20%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SOC 2 maps to CSA CCM v4 with 20% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 54 SOC 2 controls identifies 43 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in CC - Common Criteria (Security).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 54 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 38 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

A - Availability(13 mappings)

SOC2-A1.1Maintains capacity to meet availability commitments3 targets
CSA-BCR-02Risk assessment and impact analysis
CSA-BCR-04Business continuity planning
CSA-BCR-05Documentation
SOC2-A1.2Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability5 targets
CSA-BCR-02Risk assessment and impact analysis
CSA-BCR-04Business continuity planning
CSA-BCR-05Documentation
CSA-BCR-08Backup
CSA-CEK-20Key recovery
SOC2-A1.3Recovery plan procedures support system recovery from failures5 targets
CSA-BCR-02Risk assessment and impact analysis
CSA-BCR-04Business continuity planning
CSA-BCR-05Documentation
CSA-BCR-08Backup
CSA-CEK-20Key recovery

CC - Common Criteria (Security)(7 mappings)

SOC2-CC6.2Prior to granting access, registration and authorization processes are established3 targets
CSA-IAM-05Least privilege
CSA-IAM-11CSC authorization to tenant and service component provisioning
CSA-IAM-16Authorization mechanisms
SOC2-CC6.3Role-based access and least privilege are enforced4 targets
CSA-IAM-01Identity and access management policy and procedures
CSA-IAM-05Least privilege
CSA-IAM-11CSC authorization to tenant and service component provisioning
CSA-IAM-16Authorization mechanisms

+18 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between SOC 2 and CSA CCM v4?

SOC 2 has 54 controls across its framework, while CSA CCM v4 covers 171 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CC - Common Criteria (Security), where 26 SOC 2 controls have no direct CSA CCM v4 equivalent.

How many controls map between SOC 2 and CSA CCM v4?

Of 54 total SOC 2 controls, 11 map directly to CSA CCM v4 controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 43 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SOC 2 to CSA CCM v4?

43 SOC 2 controls have no direct equivalent in CSA CCM v4. The highest concentration of gaps is in CC - Common Criteria (Security) with 26 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SOC 2 and CSA CCM v4?

The domain with the highest gap count is CC - Common Criteria (Security) (26 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.