SOC 2vsGDPR
See exactly how SOC 2 controls map to GDPR. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which GDPR controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
SOC 2 maps to GDPR with 52% coverage across 32 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 61 SOC 2 controls identifies 29 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in CC - Common Criteria (Security).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 61 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 72 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
A - Availability(1 mappings)
C - Confidentiality(2 mappings)
CC - Common Criteria (Security)(13 mappings)
P - Privacy(4 mappings)
+52 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The SOC 2 to GDPR crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which GDPR controls your existing SOC 2 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
12 of 40 GDPR controls are evidenced by work you have already done for SOC 2. 28 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Formal process to receive, address, resolve and communicate resolution of requests.
Grounded in SOC2-P8.1 Inquiries, complaints, and disputes regarding personal information are addressed. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Process personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences, or related security measures, only under the control of official authority or where Union or Member State law authorises the processing and provides appropriate...
Every one of the 12 evidenced controls and 28 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
16 of 61 SOC 2 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for GDPR. 45 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Article 12 requires concise, intelligible, plain language notice, kept accessible and current.
Grounded in GDPR-Art.12 Transparent information, communication and modalities for rights. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Maintains, monitors, and evaluates current processing capacity and use of system components (infrastructure, data, and software) to manage capacity demand and to enable the implementation of additional capacity to help meet its objectives
Every one of the 16 evidenced controls and 45 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 52% in the header counts how many SOC 2 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many GDPR controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other SOC 2 comparisons
Other GDPR comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between SOC 2 and GDPR?
SOC 2 has 61 controls across its framework, while GDPR covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 32 overlapping controls (52% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CC - Common Criteria (Security), where 22 SOC 2 controls have no direct GDPR equivalent.
How many controls map between SOC 2 and GDPR?
Of 61 total SOC 2 controls, 32 map directly to GDPR controls, representing 52% coverage. The remaining 29 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping SOC 2 to GDPR?
29 SOC 2 controls have no direct equivalent in GDPR. The highest concentration of gaps is in CC - Common Criteria (Security) with 22 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between SOC 2 and GDPR?
The domain with the highest gap count is CC - Common Criteria (Security) (22 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.