Cross-Framework Mapping

AWS Well-Architected Security PillarvsFedRAMP Moderate

See exactly how AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls map to FedRAMP Moderate. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

219
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
98%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which FedRAMP Moderate controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar maps to FedRAMP Moderate with 98% coverage across 62 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 63 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls identifies 1 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Security Foundations.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 63 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 219 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.

Security Foundations(20 mappings)

SEC01-BP01Separate workloads using accounts5 targets
→AC-4(21)Physical or Logical Separation of Information Flows
→AC-5Separation of Duties
→AU-9Protection of Audit Information
→SC-2Separation of System and User Functionality
→SC-7Boundary Protection
SEC01-BP02Secure account root user and properties3 targets
→AC-2(9)Restrictions on Use of Shared and Group Accounts
→AC-6(5)Privileged Accounts
→IA-2(1)MFA to Privileged Accounts
SEC01-BP03Identify and validate control objectives4 targets
→CA-2Control Assessments
→PL-10Baseline Selection. Select a control baseline for the system
→PL-2System Security and Privacy Plans
→SI-6Security and Privacy Function Verification (SI-6)
SEC01-BP04Stay up to date with security threats and recommendations3 targets
→RA-3Risk Assessment
→RA-5(2)Update Vulnerabilities to be Scanned
→SI-5Security Alerts, Advisories, and Directives
SEC01-BP05Reduce security management scope2 targets
→SA-8Security and Privacy Engineering Principles
→SA-9External System Services
SEC01-BP06Automate deployment of standard security controls3 targets
→CM-2Baseline Configuration
→CM-2(2)Automation Support for Accuracy and Currency
→CM-2(3)Retention of Previous Configurations

+199 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to FedRAMP Moderate crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which FedRAMP Moderate controls your existing AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar into FedRAMP Moderate lands at 23.5%, while FedRAMP Moderate into AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar lands at 69.8%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar evidence buys you for FedRAMP Moderate, the other asks the reverse.

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar into FedRAMP Moderate
23.5%

76 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls are evidenced by work you have already done for AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. 247 are genuine gaps.

FedRAMP Moderate into AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar
69.8%

44 of 63 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls are evidenced by work you have already done for FedRAMP Moderate. 19 are genuine gaps.

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to FedRAMP Moderate
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 98% in the header counts how many AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many FedRAMP Moderate controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 868 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and FedRAMP Moderate?

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar has 63 controls across its framework, while FedRAMP Moderate covers 323 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 62 overlapping controls (98% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Foundations, where 1 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct FedRAMP Moderate equivalent.

How many controls map between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and FedRAMP Moderate?

Of 63 total AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, 62 map directly to FedRAMP Moderate controls, representing 98% coverage. The remaining 1 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to FedRAMP Moderate?

1 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct equivalent in FedRAMP Moderate. The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Foundations with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and FedRAMP Moderate?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security Foundations (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.