SOC 2vsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)
See exactly how SOC 2 controls map to CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
SOC 2 maps to CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) with 56% coverage across 34 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 61 SOC 2 controls identifies 27 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in P - Privacy.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 61 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 61 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
A - Availability(8 mappings)
C - Confidentiality(1 mappings)
CC - Common Criteria (Security)(11 mappings)
+41 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The SOC 2 to CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls your existing SOC 2 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. SOC 2 into CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) lands at 48.7%, while CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) into SOC 2 lands at 29.5%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your SOC 2 evidence buys you for CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49), the other asks the reverse.
19 of 39 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls are evidenced by work you have already done for SOC 2. 20 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Risk identification and analysis is the enterprise risk management category.
Grounded in SOC2-CC3.2 COSO principle 7: Identifies risks and analyzes to determine how managed. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
In addressing the prescribed categories, follow generally accepted standards and best practices with respect to the development, operation, reliability, security and capacity of automated systems.
Every one of the 19 evidenced controls and 20 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
18 of 61 SOC 2 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49). 43 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Capacity category requires monitoring, testing and analysis of current and projected capacity.
Grounded in CFTC-SS-12 Capacity and Performance Planning Category. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Identifies and maintains confidential information to meet the entity's objectives related to confidentiality
Every one of the 18 evidenced controls and 43 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 56% in the header counts how many SOC 2 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other SOC 2 comparisons
Other CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between SOC 2 and CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)?
SOC 2 has 61 controls across its framework, while CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) covers 39 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 34 overlapping controls (56% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in P - Privacy, where 18 SOC 2 controls have no direct CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) equivalent.
How many controls map between SOC 2 and CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)?
Of 61 total SOC 2 controls, 34 map directly to CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls, representing 56% coverage. The remaining 27 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping SOC 2 to CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)?
27 SOC 2 controls have no direct equivalent in CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49). The highest concentration of gaps is in P - Privacy with 18 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between SOC 2 and CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)?
The domain with the highest gap count is P - Privacy (18 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.