SOC 2vsAPPI
See exactly how SOC 2 controls map to APPI. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which APPI controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
SOC 2 maps to APPI with 44% coverage across 27 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 61 SOC 2 controls identifies 34 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in CC - Common Criteria (Security).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 61 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 52 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
CC - Common Criteria (Security)(13 mappings)
P - Privacy(7 mappings)
+32 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The SOC 2 to APPI crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which APPI controls your existing SOC 2 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. SOC 2 into APPI lands at 53.3%, while APPI into SOC 2 lands at 26.2%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your SOC 2 evidence buys you for APPI, the other asks the reverse.
16 of 30 APPI controls are evidenced by work you have already done for SOC 2. 14 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
SOC 2 requires the purposes for which personal information is used to be specified and notified.
Grounded in SOC2-P1.1 Privacy notice provides clear notice about privacy practices. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Do not use personal information by a method that may encourage or induce an unlawful or unjust act.
Every one of the 16 evidenced controls and 14 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
16 of 61 SOC 2 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for APPI. 45 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Article 32 requires the business name, purposes, request procedure and complaint contact be made accessible.
Grounded in APPI-A32 Matters Concerning Retained Personal Data to Be Made Accessible. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Maintains, monitors, and evaluates current processing capacity and use of system components (infrastructure, data, and software) to manage capacity demand and to enable the implementation of additional capacity to help meet its objectives
Every one of the 16 evidenced controls and 45 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 44% in the header counts how many SOC 2 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many APPI controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other SOC 2 comparisons
Other APPI comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between SOC 2 and APPI?
SOC 2 has 61 controls across its framework, while APPI covers 30 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 27 overlapping controls (44% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CC - Common Criteria (Security), where 23 SOC 2 controls have no direct APPI equivalent.
How many controls map between SOC 2 and APPI?
Of 61 total SOC 2 controls, 27 map directly to APPI controls, representing 44% coverage. The remaining 34 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping SOC 2 to APPI?
34 SOC 2 controls have no direct equivalent in APPI. The highest concentration of gaps is in CC - Common Criteria (Security) with 23 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between SOC 2 and APPI?
The domain with the highest gap count is CC - Common Criteria (Security) (23 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.