Cross-Framework Mapping

Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ)vsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)

See exactly how Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) controls map to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
5
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) maps to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Breach and Enforcement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Scope and Principles(1 mappings)

RUSPD-1Scope, Definitions, Principles under 152-FZ
NAIC-6Cybersecurity Event Investigation and Notification - Sections 6 and 7

Lawful Basis and Consent(1 mappings)

RUSPD-2Lawful Basis, Consent, Notice
NAIC-1NAIC Model Law Adoption, Scope, and Licensee Definitions

High-Risk Processing(1 mappings)

RUSPD-4Special Categories, Biometric Data
NAIC-6Cybersecurity Event Investigation and Notification - Sections 6 and 7

Related Comparisons

Other Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) comparisons

Other NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) has 8 controls across its framework, while NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Breach and Enforcement, where 1 Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) controls have no direct NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) equivalent.

How many controls map between Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

Of 8 total Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) controls, 3 map directly to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

5 Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) controls have no direct equivalent in NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668). The highest concentration of gaps is in Breach and Enforcement with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Breach and Enforcement (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.