DAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)vsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)
See exactly how DAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) controls map to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
DAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) maps to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) with 38% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 DAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Data Ethics and Maturity.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 28 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Data Architecture and Modeling(5 mappings)
Data Integration, Quality and Metadata(9 mappings)
Data Storage, Operations and Security(6 mappings)
+8 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other DAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) comparisons
Other NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between DAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?
DAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) has 21 controls across its framework, while NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Data Ethics and Maturity, where 3 DAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) controls have no direct NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) equivalent.
How many controls map between DAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?
Of 21 total DAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) controls, 8 map directly to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping DAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?
13 DAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) controls have no direct equivalent in NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668). The highest concentration of gaps is in Data Ethics and Maturity with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between DAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Data Ethics and Maturity (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.