Cross-Framework Mapping

Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ)vsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
4
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Breach and Enforcement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Scope and Principles(1 mappings)

RUSPD-1Scope, Definitions, Principles under 152-FZ
FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)

Lawful Basis and Consent(1 mappings)

RUSPD-2Lawful Basis, Consent, Notice
FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))

High-Risk Processing(2 mappings)

RUSPD-4Special Categories, Biometric Data2 targets
FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)

Related Comparisons

Other Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) comparisons

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) has 8 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Breach and Enforcement, where 1 Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 8 total Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) controls, 3 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

5 Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Breach and Enforcement with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Breach and Enforcement (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.