Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27017vsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)

See exactly how ISO 27017 controls map to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
28
Gaps Found
19%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27017 maps to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) with 19% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ISO 27017 controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cloud-specific.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

ISO 27017: Cloud Governance(2 mappings)

ISO27017-03Cloud risk assessment2 targets
NAIC-1NAIC Model Law Adoption, Scope, and Licensee Definitions
NAIC-2Information Security Program (ISP) - Section 4

ISO 27017: Identity & Access in Cloud(2 mappings)

ISO27017-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
NAIC-1NAIC Model Law Adoption, Scope, and Licensee Definitions
ISO27017-08Privileged access in cloud environments
NAIC-6Cybersecurity Event Investigation and Notification - Sections 6 and 7

ISO 27017: Data Protection in Cloud(4 mappings)

ISO27017-11Data classification for cloud
NAIC-2Information Security Program (ISP) - Section 4
ISO27017-12Encryption of cloud-stored data2 targets
NAIC-1NAIC Model Law Adoption, Scope, and Licensee Definitions
NAIC-2Information Security Program (ISP) - Section 4
ISO27017-14Data backup and recovery in cloud
NAIC-5Third Party Service Provider Oversight - Section 4(F)(3) and Section 5

ISO 27017: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(1 mappings)

ISO27017-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
NAIC-2Information Security Program (ISP) - Section 4

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 700 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27017 and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

ISO 27017 has 37 controls across its framework, while NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (19% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cloud-specific, where 7 ISO 27017 controls have no direct NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27017 and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

Of 37 total ISO 27017 controls, 7 map directly to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls — representing 19% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27017 to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

30 ISO 27017 controls have no direct equivalent in NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668). The highest concentration of gaps is in Cloud-specific with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27017 and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cloud-specific (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.