Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP ASVSvsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)

See exactly how OWASP ASVS controls map to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
43%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP ASVS maps to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) with 43% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 14 OWASP ASVS controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in V1 Architecture and Threat Modelling.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 14 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

V2 Authentication(2 mappings)

OWASPASVS-2Authentication and Credential Storage (V2 + V2.4)2 targets
NAIC-1NAIC Model Law Adoption, Scope, and Licensee Definitions
NAIC-2Information Security Program (ISP) - Section 4

V4 Access Control(2 mappings)

OWASPASVS-4Access Control (V4 + V4.3)2 targets
NAIC-2Information Security Program (ISP) - Section 4
NAIC-6Cybersecurity Event Investigation and Notification - Sections 6 and 7

V6 Cryptography at Rest(2 mappings)

OWASPASVS-6Stored Cryptography (V6)2 targets
NAIC-1NAIC Model Law Adoption, Scope, and Licensee Definitions
NAIC-2Information Security Program (ISP) - Section 4

V7 Error Handling and Logging(1 mappings)

OWASPASVS-7Error Handling and Logging (V7)
NAIC-2Information Security Program (ISP) - Section 4

V8 Data Protection(2 mappings)

OWASPASVS-8Data Protection (V8 + V8.3)2 targets
NAIC-2Information Security Program (ISP) - Section 4
NAIC-5Third Party Service Provider Oversight - Section 4(F)(3) and Section 5

V9 Communication(2 mappings)

OWASPASVS-9Communication Security (V9)2 targets
NAIC-1NAIC Model Law Adoption, Scope, and Licensee Definitions
NAIC-2Information Security Program (ISP) - Section 4

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between OWASP ASVS and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

OWASP ASVS has 14 controls across its framework, while NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (43% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in V1 Architecture and Threat Modelling, where 1 OWASP ASVS controls have no direct NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP ASVS and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

Of 14 total OWASP ASVS controls, 6 map directly to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls — representing 43% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP ASVS to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

8 OWASP ASVS controls have no direct equivalent in NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668). The highest concentration of gaps is in V1 Architecture and Threat Modelling with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP ASVS and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

The domain with the highest gap count is V1 Architecture and Threat Modelling (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.