TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ)vsMARS-E

See exactly how Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) controls map to MARS-E. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) maps to MARS-E with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Breach and Enforcement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Scope and Principles(1 mappings)

RUSPD-1Scope, Definitions, Principles under 152-FZ
→MARS-E-NIST-800-53-Moderate-Baseline-Catalog-v2-0-Volume-III-Tailoring-Risk-Assessment-CategorizationMARS-E NIST 800-53 Moderate Baseline + MARS-E Catalog Volume III + Tailoring + Risk Assessment + Categorization

Lawful Basis and Consent(2 mappings)

RUSPD-2Lawful Basis, Consent, Notice2 targets
→MARS-E-Access-Control-Identity-Authentication-NIST-800-63-Identity-Assurance-Levels-MFA-AC-IA-FamiliesMARS-E Access Control + Identity + Authentication + NIST 800-63 + MFA + AC + IA Families
→MARS-E-Contingency-Media-Protection-System-Integrity-CP-MP-SI-Families-DR-COOP-Encryption-SanitizationMARS-E Contingency + Media Protection + System Integrity + CP + MP + SI Families + DR + COOP

High-Risk Processing(3 mappings)

RUSPD-4Special Categories, Biometric Data3 targets
→MARS-E-Audit-Accountability-Continuous-Monitoring-AU-Family-CM-Family-SIEM-Log-Retention-IRS-Pub-1075MARS-E Audit + Accountability + Continuous Monitoring + AU + CM Families + SIEM + IRS Pub 1075
→MARS-E-NIST-800-53-Moderate-Baseline-Catalog-v2-0-Volume-III-Tailoring-Risk-Assessment-CategorizationMARS-E NIST 800-53 Moderate Baseline + MARS-E Catalog Volume III + Tailoring + Risk Assessment + Categorization
→MARS-E-Privacy-PII-PHI-Minimum-Necessary-HIPAA-Privacy-Rule-NIST-800-122-45-CFR-164-Subpart-EMARS-E Privacy + PII + PHI + Minimum Necessary + HIPAA Privacy Rule + NIST 800-122 + 45 CFR 164 Subpart E

Related Comparisons

Other Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) comparisons

Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)3 mappingsRussia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) vs FedRAMP Rev 53 mappingsRussia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) vs Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR)3 mappingsRussia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications3 mappingsRussia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) vs NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)3 mappingsRussia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) vs NIST Privacy Framework3 mappingsRussia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) vs OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 20253 mappingsRussia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework3 mappings

Other MARS-E comparisons

Turkey KVKK vs MARS-E7 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs MARS-E7 mappingsISO 27018 vs MARS-E7 mappingsISO 13485 vs MARS-E7 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs MARS-E7 mappingsISO 27799 vs MARS-E7 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs MARS-E7 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs MARS-E7 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) and MARS-E?

Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) has 8 controls across its framework, while MARS-E covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Breach and Enforcement, where 1 Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) controls have no direct MARS-E equivalent.

How many controls map between Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) and MARS-E?

Of 8 total Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) controls, 3 map directly to MARS-E controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) to MARS-E?

5 Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) controls have no direct equivalent in MARS-E. The highest concentration of gaps is in Breach and Enforcement with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Russia Federal Law on Personal Data (152-FZ) and MARS-E?

The domain with the highest gap count is Breach and Enforcement (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.