FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)vsISO/IEC 27400:2022
See exactly how FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls map to ISO/IEC 27400:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) maps to ISO/IEC 27400:2022 with 28% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 36 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls identifies 26 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Incident Response and Reporting.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 36 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Incident Response and Reporting(7 mappings)
Purpose, Scope and Definitions(8 mappings)
Safeguard Elements(5 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27400:2022 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?
FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) has 36 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27400:2022 covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (28% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Incident Response and Reporting, where 12 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27400:2022 equivalent.
How many controls map between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?
Of 36 total FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls, 10 map directly to ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls — representing 28% coverage. The remaining 26 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) to ISO/IEC 27400:2022?
26 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27400:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in Incident Response and Reporting with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?
The domain with the highest gap count is Incident Response and Reporting (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.