Cross-Framework Mapping

South Korea ISMS-PvsISO/IEC 27011:2024

See exactly how South Korea ISMS-P controls map to ISO/IEC 27011:2024. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
11
Gaps Found
32%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

South Korea ISMS-P maps to ISO/IEC 27011:2024 with 32% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 South Korea ISMS-P controls identifies 17 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Personal Information Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 704 frameworks | 307K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 307K+ mappings across 704 frameworks.

Access Control(6 mappings)

ISMSP-AC-01Access Control Policy2 targets
27011-5.3Segregation of duties
27011-8.1User Endpoint Devices
ISMSP-AC-04Network Access Control4 targets
27011-5.3Segregation of duties
27011-6.3Awareness and Training
27011-8.1User Endpoint Devices
27011-8.2Network security and segregation

Personal Information Protection(2 mappings)

ISMSP-PI-03Third-Party Provision and Outsourcing
27011-5.6Supplier relationships and telecom supply chain
ISMSP-PI-06Personal Information Destruction
27011-8.6Data protection and backup

System and Operations Security(6 mappings)

ISMSP-SYS-02Encryption Implementation
27011-8.3Cryptography and key management
ISMSP-SYS-03Security Monitoring and Log Management
27011-8.4Logging and monitoring
ISMSP-SYS-04Vulnerability Management3 targets
27011-1Scope
27011-3Terms and definitions
27011-8.5Vulnerability and malware management
ISMSP-SYS-06Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
27011-8.6Data protection and backup
Coverage crosswalk

A South Korea ISMS-P to ISO/IEC 27011:2024 crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls your existing South Korea ISMS-P work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

South Korea ISMS-P into ISO/IEC 27011:2024
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 into South Korea ISMS-P
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

South Korea ISMS-P to ISO/IEC 27011:2024 (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 32% in the header counts how many South Korea ISMS-P controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 704 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 704 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (307K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between South Korea ISMS-P and ISO/IEC 27011:2024?

South Korea ISMS-P has 25 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27011:2024 covers 91 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Personal Information Protection, where 4 South Korea ISMS-P controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27011:2024 equivalent.

How many controls map between South Korea ISMS-P and ISO/IEC 27011:2024?

Of 25 total South Korea ISMS-P controls, 8 map directly to ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls, representing 32% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping South Korea ISMS-P to ISO/IEC 27011:2024?

17 South Korea ISMS-P controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27011:2024. The highest concentration of gaps is in Personal Information Protection with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between South Korea ISMS-P and ISO/IEC 27011:2024?

The domain with the highest gap count is Personal Information Protection (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.