TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP Top 10:2025vsISMAP (Japan)

See exactly how OWASP Top 10:2025 controls map to ISMAP (Japan). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
10
Gaps Found
37%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP Top 10:2025 maps to ISMAP (Japan) with 37% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in SSRF.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Access Control(2 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-1A01:2025 Broken Access Control2 targets
→ISMAP-CloudGovernance-ISMS-RiskAssessment-SharedResponsibility-Policy-RegulatoryCompliance-RolesResponsibilitiesISMAP Cloud Governance - ISMS per ISO 27001/JIS Q 27001 + Risk Assessment + Shared Responsibility Model + Cloud Security Policy + Regulatory Compliance + Roles and Responsibilities
→ISMAP-Identity-Access-MFA-Privileged-Federation-SSO-API-Tokens-CloudIAM-PIV-PASETOISMAP Identity and Access Management - Cloud IAM + Multi-Factor Authentication + Privileged Access + Federation/SSO + API Security + Access Tokens + My Number Card Integration + Government IAM

Cryptography(3 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-2A02:2025 Cryptographic Failures and Secret Management3 targets
→ISMAP-CloudInfrastructure-NetworkSegmentation-Container-Serverless-WorkloadProtection-Hardening-ConfigManagementISMAP Cloud Infrastructure - VPC Network Segmentation + Container/Serverless Security + Cloud Workload Protection (CWPP) + Image/Template Hardening + CIS Benchmarks + Configuration Management + IaC
→ISMAP-DataProtection-Classification-Encryption-DataResidencyJapan-Backup-SecureDeletion-Cryptography-FIPSISMAP Data Protection - Data Classification + AES-256 Encryption At Rest + TLS 1.3 In Transit + Data Residency Japan + Backup + Secure Deletion + Cryptography per FIPS 140-3 + CRYPTREC + KMS HSM
→ISMAP-Identity-Access-MFA-Privileged-Federation-SSO-API-Tokens-CloudIAM-PIV-PASETOISMAP Identity and Access Management - Cloud IAM + Multi-Factor Authentication + Privileged Access + Federation/SSO + API Security + Access Tokens + My Number Card Integration + Government IAM

Secure Design(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-4A04:2025 Insecure Design and Business Logic (incl. A11 API Abuse)
→ISMAP-DataProtection-Classification-Encryption-DataResidencyJapan-Backup-SecureDeletion-Cryptography-FIPSISMAP Data Protection - Data Classification + AES-256 Encryption At Rest + TLS 1.3 In Transit + Data Residency Japan + Backup + Secure Deletion + Cryptography per FIPS 140-3 + CRYPTREC + KMS HSM

Component Security(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-6A06:2025 Vulnerable and Outdated Components
→ISMAP-Identity-Access-MFA-Privileged-Federation-SSO-API-Tokens-CloudIAM-PIV-PASETOISMAP Identity and Access Management - Cloud IAM + Multi-Factor Authentication + Privileged Access + Federation/SSO + API Security + Access Tokens + My Number Card Integration + Government IAM

Authentication(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-7A07:2025 Identification and Authentication Failures
→ISMAP-Identity-Access-MFA-Privileged-Federation-SSO-API-Tokens-CloudIAM-PIV-PASETOISMAP Identity and Access Management - Cloud IAM + Multi-Factor Authentication + Privileged Access + Federation/SSO + API Security + Access Tokens + My Number Card Integration + Government IAM

Logging and Monitoring(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-9A09:2025 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
→ISMAP-CloudOperations-Monitoring-Logging-IncidentResponse-NISC-Reporting-Vulnerability-Change-SLAISMAP Cloud Operations - Security Monitoring + SIEM + Logging + Incident Response + NISC Reporting + Vulnerability Management + Penetration Testing + Change Management + SLA Management

Related Comparisons

Other OWASP Top 10:2025 comparisons

OWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security10 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.010 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs South Korea ISMS-P10 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)9 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST Privacy Framework9 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts9 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements9 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 59 mappings

Other ISMAP (Japan) comparisons

MITRE D3FEND vs ISMAP (Japan)5 mappingsSpain ENS vs ISMAP (Japan)5 mappingsBSI IT-Grundschutz vs ISMAP (Japan)5 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISMAP (Japan)5 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs ISMAP (Japan)5 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISMAP (Japan)5 mappingsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs ISMAP (Japan)5 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs ISMAP (Japan)5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 700 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between OWASP Top 10:2025 and ISMAP (Japan)?

OWASP Top 10:2025 has 19 controls across its framework, while ISMAP (Japan) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (37% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SSRF, where 1 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct ISMAP (Japan) equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP Top 10:2025 and ISMAP (Japan)?

Of 19 total OWASP Top 10:2025 controls, 6 map directly to ISMAP (Japan) controls — representing 37% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP Top 10:2025 to ISMAP (Japan)?

4 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct equivalent in ISMAP (Japan). The highest concentration of gaps is in SSRF with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP Top 10:2025 and ISMAP (Japan)?

The domain with the highest gap count is SSRF (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.