TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5vsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements

See exactly how NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls map to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

26
Controls Mapped
146
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 maps to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements with 10% coverage across 17 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 172 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls identifies 155 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in SC - System and Communications Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 172 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 26 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

CA - Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring(2 mappings)

NIST800-CA-7Continuous monitoring
→IR-4Continuous Monitoring
NIST800-CA-8Penetration testing
→VES-3Penetration Testing

CP - Contingency Planning(2 mappings)

NIST800-CP-10System recovery and reconstitution
→CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan
NIST800-CP-9System backup
→CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan

IA - Identification and Authentication(3 mappings)

NIST800-IA-4Identifier management
→CYB-2Account Security Measures
NIST800-IA-7Cryptographic module authentication
→CYB-2Account Security Measures
NIST800-IA-8Identification and authentication of non-organizational users
→CYB-2Account Security Measures

IR - Incident Response(6 mappings)

NIST800-IR-2Incident response training2 targets
→CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises
→CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan
NIST800-IR-5Incident monitoring2 targets
→CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises
→CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan
NIST800-IR-7Incident response assistance2 targets
→CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises
→CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan

PE - Physical and Environmental Protection(7 mappings)

NIST800-PE-14Environmental controls3 targets
→33CFR105.305Facility Security Assessment
→33CFR105.400Facility Security Plan (FSP)
→33CFR105.405Format and Content of FSP
NIST800-PE-2Physical access authorizations3 targets
→33CFR105.305Facility Security Assessment
→33CFR105.400Facility Security Plan (FSP)
→33CFR105.405Format and Content of FSP
NIST800-PE-3Physical access control
→33CFR105.305Facility Security Assessment

+6 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 comparisons

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange36 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements34 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs FedRAMP Rev 534 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs CSA CCM v433 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments33 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management33 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)33 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges33 mappings

Other US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons

FedRAMP Rev 5 vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsDefence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 has 172 controls across its framework, while US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 17 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SC - System and Communications Protection, where 17 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

Of 172 total NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls, 17 map directly to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 155 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

155 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct equivalent in US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in SC - System and Communications Protection with 17 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is SC - System and Communications Protection (17 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.