Cross-Framework Mapping

FedRAMP Rev 5vsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements

See exactly how FedRAMP Rev 5 controls map to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

30
Controls Mapped
34
Gaps Found
27%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FedRAMP Rev 5 maps to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements with 27% coverage across 17 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 64 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls identifies 47 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Access Control and Authentication.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 64 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 30 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

System Protection and Communications(4 mappings)

3.10Physical and Environmental Protection3 targets
33CFR105.305Facility Security Assessment
33CFR105.400Facility Security Plan (FSP)
33CFR105.405Format and Content of FSP
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan

Access Control and Authentication(6 mappings)

CJIS-5Identification and Authentication
CYB-2Account Security Measures
ICS-AC-2Authentication mechanisms
CYB-2Account Security Measures
ICS-AC-4Physical access controls3 targets
33CFR105.305Facility Security Assessment
33CFR105.400Facility Security Plan (FSP)
33CFR105.405Format and Content of FSP
NIS2-IA-12Multi-Factor Authentication
CYB-2Account Security Measures

Audit, Assessment and Risk(4 mappings)

FEDRAMP-CA-7Continuous Monitoring2 targets
IR-4Continuous Monitoring
VES-3Penetration Testing
FEDRAMP-RA-3Risk Assessment
IR-2Incident Documentation
FEDRAMP-RA-5Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning
VES-3Penetration Testing

Incident Response and Maintenance(6 mappings)

FEDRAMP-IR-1Incident Response Policy2 targets
CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises
CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan
FEDRAMP-IR-4Incident Handling
CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan
FEDRAMP-IR-6Incident Reporting2 targets
CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises
CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan
FEDRAMP-SI-2Flaw Remediation
VES-3Penetration Testing

+10 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other FedRAMP Rev 5 comparisons

Other US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FedRAMP Rev 5 and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

FedRAMP Rev 5 has 64 controls across its framework, while US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 17 overlapping controls (27% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Access Control and Authentication, where 15 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls have no direct US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between FedRAMP Rev 5 and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

Of 64 total FedRAMP Rev 5 controls, 17 map directly to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls — representing 27% coverage. The remaining 47 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FedRAMP Rev 5 to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

47 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls have no direct equivalent in US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Access Control and Authentication with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FedRAMP Rev 5 and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Access Control and Authentication (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.