TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
32
Gaps Found
9%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements with 9% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 32 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

System Protection and Communications(1 mappings)

3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit
→USMTSA-1Facility Security Assessment and Plan

Incident Response and Media Protection(2 mappings)

3.6Encrypt Data on End-User Devices
→USMTSA-2Cybersecurity Assessment and CSO Designation
3.6.1Incident Response Capability
→USMTSA-2Cybersecurity Assessment and CSO Designation

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security20 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 518 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs MTCS (Singapore)17 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST Privacy Framework16 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14615 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14515 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14415 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISMAP (Japan)15 mappings

Other US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements2 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements2 mappingsIACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements2 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements2 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements2 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements2 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements2 mappingsUK Gambling Commission - Cyber Resilience Requirements vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements2 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements covers 4 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (9% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 14 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 3 map directly to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls — representing 9% coverage. The remaining 32 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

32 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.