Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5vsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

814
Controls Mapped
200
Gaps Found
23%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 23% coverage across 251 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 1,014 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls identifies 786 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in AC - Access Control.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 1,014 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 814 mapped controls across 20 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.

AC - Access Control(20 mappings)

NIST800-AC-1AC-1 Policy and Procedures3 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.PO-01Policy for managing cybersecurity risks is established based on organizational context, cybersecurity strategy, and priorities and is communicated and enforced
→NIST-CSF-GV.PO-02Policy for managing cybersecurity risks is reviewed, updated, communicated, and enforced to reflect changes in requirements, threats, technology, and organizational mission
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties
NIST800-AC-14AC-14 Permitted Actions Without Identification or Authentication
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties
NIST800-AC-16AC-16 Security and Privacy Attributes3 targets
→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-05Assets are prioritized based on classification, criticality, resources, and impact on the mission
→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-07Inventories of data and corresponding metadata for designated data types are maintained
→NIST-CSF-PR.DS-01The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-at-rest are protected
NIST800-AC-17AC-17 Remote Access
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-01Networks and environments are protected from unauthorized logical access and usage
NIST800-AC-18AC-18 Wireless Access
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-01Networks and environments are protected from unauthorized logical access and usage
NIST800-AC-19AC-19 Access Control for Mobile Devices
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-01Networks and environments are protected from unauthorized logical access and usage
NIST800-AC-2AC-2 Account Management2 targets
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed by the organization
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties
NIST800-AC-20AC-20 Use of External Systems
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-05Requirements to address cybersecurity risks in supply chains are established, prioritized, and integrated into contracts and other types of agreements with suppliers and other relevant third parties
NIST800-AC-21AC-21 Information Sharing4 targets
→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-07Inventories of data and corresponding metadata for designated data types are maintained
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties
→NIST-CSF-PR.DS-01The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-at-rest are protected
→NIST-CSF-RS.CO-03Information is shared with designated internal and external stakeholders
NIST800-AC-23AC-23 Data Mining Protection3 targets
→NIST-CSF-DE.AE-03Information is correlated from multiple sources
→NIST-CSF-DE.CM-03Personnel activity and technology usage are monitored to find potentially adverse events
→NIST-CSF-DE.CM-09Computing hardware and software, runtime environments, and their data are monitored to find potentially adverse events

+794 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls your existing NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 into NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 lands at 67.9%, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 into NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 lands at 9.3%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 evidence buys you for NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0, the other asks the reverse.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 into NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
67.9%

72 of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. 34 are genuine gaps.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 into NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
9.3%

94 of 1014 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. 920 are genuine gaps.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 23% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 868 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 has 1,014 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 251 overlapping controls (23% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AC - Access Control, where 116 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 1,014 total NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls, 251 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, representing 23% coverage. The remaining 786 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

786 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in AC - Access Control with 116 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is AC - Access Control (116 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.