TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsDORA

See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to DORA. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
94
Gaps Found
8%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to DORA with 8% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 97 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in GV - Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

DE - Detect(1 mappings)

NIST-CSF-DE.CM-01Networks and network services are monitored to find potentially adverse events
→DORA-Art.10Detection

GV - Govern(2 mappings)

NIST-CSF-GV.RM-01Risk management objectives are established and agreed upon2 targets
→DORA-Art.5Governance and organisation
→DORA-Art.6ICT risk management framework

ID - Identify(2 mappings)

NIST-CSF-ID.IM-01Improvements are identified from security test and exercise results
→DORA-Art.13Learning and evolving
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-01Vulnerabilities in assets are identified, validated, and recorded
→DORA-Art.8Identification

PR - Protect(2 mappings)

NIST-CSF-PR.DS-01The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-at-rest are protected
→DORA-Art.9Protection and prevention
NIST-CSF-PR.DS-11Backups of data are created, protected, maintained, and tested
→DORA-Art.12Backup policies and procedures, restoration and recovery

RC - Recover(1 mappings)

NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed
→DORA-Art.11Response and recovery

RS - Respond(4 mappings)

NIST-CSF-RS.CO-02Internal and external stakeholders are notified of incidents2 targets
→DORA-Art.14Communication
→DORA-Art.19Reporting of major ICT-related incidents
NIST-CSF-RS.MA-01The incident response plan is executed in coordination with relevant third parties2 targets
→DORA-Art.11Response and recovery
→DORA-Art.17ICT-related incident management process

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ISO 27001:202282 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Belgium CyberFundamentals32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASEAN Data Management Framework25 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Azure Security Benchmark22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)19 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)19 mappings

Other DORA comparisons

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (EIOPA-BoS-20/600) vs DORA12 mappingsEU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) vs DORA8 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs DORA8 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs DORA6 mappingsEU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) vs DORA2 mappingsEU Cyber Solidarity Act (Regulation (EU) 2025/38) vs DORA2 mappingsEU Chips Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/1781) vs DORA2 mappingsECB TIBER-EU Framework vs DORA2 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and DORA?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 106 controls across its framework, while DORA covers 26 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GV - Govern, where 27 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct DORA equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and DORA?

Of 106 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 9 map directly to DORA controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 97 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to DORA?

97 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in DORA. The highest concentration of gaps is in GV - Govern with 27 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and DORA?

The domain with the highest gap count is GV - Govern (27 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.