TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5vsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices

See exactly how NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls map to ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
183
Gaps Found
5%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 maps to ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices with 5% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 192 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls identifies 183 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AC - Access Control.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 192 controls analysed | 716 frameworks | 430K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 430K+ mappings across 716 frameworks.

AT - Awareness and Training(2 mappings)

NIST800-AT-2Literacy training and awareness
→ASIC-CR-AT-1Staff awareness and training
NIST800-AT-3Role-based training
→ASIC-CR-AT-2Continuous development

AU - Audit and Accountability(1 mappings)

NIST800-AU-6Audit record review, analysis, and reporting
→ASIC-CR-DE-1Continuous monitoring with SIEM

CA - Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring(1 mappings)

NIST800-CA-8Penetration testing
→ASIC-CR-DE-3Red teaming

CM - Configuration Management(2 mappings)

NIST800-CM-6Configuration settings
→ASIC-CR-AM-2Configuration management
NIST800-CM-8System component inventory
→ASIC-CR-AM-1Centralised asset management system

RA - Risk Assessment(1 mappings)

NIST800-RA-3Risk assessment
→ASIC-CR-RM-1Intelligence-led cyber risk management

SC - System and Communications Protection(2 mappings)

NIST800-SC-28Protection of information at rest
→ASIC-CR-PR-3Encryption of data at rest and in transit
NIST800-SC-8Transmission confidentiality and integrity
→ASIC-CR-PR-3Encryption of data at rest and in transit

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 comparisons

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs ISO 27001:2022130 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-17140 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange35 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements34 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments33 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)33 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges33 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)33 mappings

Other ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices27 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices11 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices7 mappingsACSC Essential Eight vs ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices1 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 716 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 716 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (430K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices?

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 has 192 controls across its framework, while ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices covers 29 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (5% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AC - Access Control, where 15 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices?

Of 192 total NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls, 9 map directly to ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls — representing 5% coverage. The remaining 183 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices?

183 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct equivalent in ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices. The highest concentration of gaps is in AC - Access Control with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices?

The domain with the highest gap count is AC - Access Control (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.