ISO 55001:2014vsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices
See exactly how ISO 55001:2014 controls map to ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 55001:2014 maps to ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices with 5% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 ISO 55001:2014 controls identifies 20 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Leadership iTeh STANDARD PREVIEW – ISO 55001:2014.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.
Context of the organization – ISO 55001:2014(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 55001:2014 comparisons
Other ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 723 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 55001:2014 and ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices?
ISO 55001:2014 has 21 controls across its framework, while ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices covers 29 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (5% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Leadership iTeh STANDARD PREVIEW – ISO 55001:2014, where 3 ISO 55001:2014 controls have no direct ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 55001:2014 and ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices?
Of 21 total ISO 55001:2014 controls, 1 map directly to ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls — representing 5% coverage. The remaining 20 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 55001:2014 to ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices?
20 ISO 55001:2014 controls have no direct equivalent in ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices. The highest concentration of gaps is in Leadership iTeh STANDARD PREVIEW – ISO 55001:2014 with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 55001:2014 and ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices?
The domain with the highest gap count is Leadership iTeh STANDARD PREVIEW – ISO 55001:2014 (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.