APRA CPS 234vsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices
See exactly how APRA CPS 234 controls map to ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
APRA CPS 234 maps to ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices with 37% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 APRA CPS 234 controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in APRA CPS 234: Operational Resilience.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 725 frameworks | 447K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 8 domains. Sign up to explore all 447K+ mappings across 725 frameworks.
APRA CPS 234: Information Security Governance(3 mappings)
APRA CPS 234: Cybersecurity Controls(2 mappings)
APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management(3 mappings)
Asset Management(1 mappings)
Assurance(1 mappings)
APRA CPS 234: Incident Management & Reporting(2 mappings)
Incident Response(2 mappings)
Capability(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other APRA CPS 234 comparisons
Other ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 725 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 725 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (447K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between APRA CPS 234 and ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices?
APRA CPS 234 has 35 controls across its framework, while ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices covers 29 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (37% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in APRA CPS 234: Operational Resilience, where 5 APRA CPS 234 controls have no direct ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices equivalent.
How many controls map between APRA CPS 234 and ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices?
Of 35 total APRA CPS 234 controls, 15 map directly to ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls — representing 37% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 234 to ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices?
30 APRA CPS 234 controls have no direct equivalent in ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices. The highest concentration of gaps is in APRA CPS 234: Operational Resilience with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 234 and ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices?
The domain with the highest gap count is APRA CPS 234: Operational Resilience (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.