Cross-Framework Mapping

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security IncidentsvsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices

See exactly how ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls map to ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

21
Controls Mapped
16
Gaps Found
41%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents maps to ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices with 41% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls identifies 22 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 21 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution(6 mappings)

ASD37-04User application hardening (Essential)
ASIC-CYB-ID-4Configuration Management
ASD37-06Email content filtering (Excellent)
SWIFT-DET-02Malware Protection
ASD37-10Server application hardening (Very Good)
ASIC-CYB-ID-4Configuration Management
ASD37-11Operating system hardening (Very Good)
ASIC-CYB-ID-4Configuration Management
ASD37-12Antivirus software with heuristics (Very Good)
SWIFT-DET-02Malware Protection
ASD37-16Antivirus software with signatures (Limited)
SWIFT-DET-02Malware Protection

Limiting the Extent of Cyber Security Incidents(3 mappings)

ASD37-20Multi-factor authentication (Essential)2 targets
ASIC-CYB-ID-2Access Control
ASIC-CYB-RES-3Resilience by Design
ASD37-23Protect authentication credentials (Excellent)
ASIC-CYB-ID-2Access Control

Detecting Cyber Security Incidents and Responding(8 mappings)

ASD37-29Host-based IDS/IPS (Very Good)
ASIC-CYB-DR-1Continuous Monitoring
ASD37-31Hunt to discover incidents (Very Good)3 targets
ASIC-CYB-DR-2Incident Response Plan
ASIC-CYB-RES-1Business Continuity Planning
SWIFT-DET-04Cyber Incident Response
ASD37-32Network-based IDS/IPS (Limited)
ASIC-CYB-DR-1Continuous Monitoring
ASD37-33Capture network traffic (Limited)3 targets
ASIC-CYB-DR-2Incident Response Plan
ASIC-CYB-RES-1Business Continuity Planning
SWIFT-DET-04Cyber Incident Response

Recovering Data and System Availability(3 mappings)

ASD37-34Regular backups (Essential)
ASIC-CYB-RES-2Recovery Testing
ASD37-35Business continuity and disaster recovery plans (Very Good)2 targets
ASIC-CYB-RES-1Business Continuity Planning
ASIC-CYB-RES-2Recovery Testing

+1 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents comparisons

Other ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices?

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents has 37 controls across its framework, while ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (41% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution, where 11 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices equivalent.

How many controls map between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices?

Of 37 total ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls, 15 map directly to ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls — representing 41% coverage. The remaining 22 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents to ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices?

22 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct equivalent in ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices. The highest concentration of gaps is in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices?

The domain with the highest gap count is Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.