NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsISMAP (Japan)
See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to ISMAP (Japan). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to ISMAP (Japan) with 43% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 20 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(4 mappings)
Incident Response and Media Protection(3 mappings)
Access Control and Identification(2 mappings)
System Protection and Communications(8 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons
Other ISMAP (Japan) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and ISMAP (Japan)?
NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while ISMAP (Japan) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (43% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 8 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct ISMAP (Japan) equivalent.
How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and ISMAP (Japan)?
Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 15 map directly to ISMAP (Japan) controls — representing 43% coverage. The remaining 20 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements to ISMAP (Japan)?
20 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in ISMAP (Japan). The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and ISMAP (Japan)?
The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.