NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile DevicesvsSIG (Shared Assessments)
See exactly how NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices controls map to SIG (Shared Assessments). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices maps to SIG (Shared Assessments) with 29% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 34 NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices controls identifies 24 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Technical Controls.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 34 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
Mobile Device Security Controls(4 mappings)
Mobile Device Policies(6 mappings)
Mobile Device Security Technologies(3 mappings)
A NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices to SIG (Shared Assessments) crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which SIG (Shared Assessments) controls your existing NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 29% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many SIG (Shared Assessments) controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices comparisons
Other SIG (Shared Assessments) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices and SIG (Shared Assessments)?
NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices has 34 controls across its framework, while SIG (Shared Assessments) covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Technical Controls, where 5 NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices controls have no direct SIG (Shared Assessments) equivalent.
How many controls map between NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices and SIG (Shared Assessments)?
Of 34 total NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices controls, 10 map directly to SIG (Shared Assessments) controls, representing 29% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices to SIG (Shared Assessments)?
24 NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices controls have no direct equivalent in SIG (Shared Assessments). The highest concentration of gaps is in Technical Controls with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices and SIG (Shared Assessments)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Technical Controls (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.