Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-122vsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation

See exactly how NIST SP 800-122 controls map to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-122 maps to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation with 25% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST SP 800-122 controls identifies 6 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Sharing and Transfers.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Incident Response(3 mappings)

NISTSP122-6PII Breach Response and Incident Handling3 targets
IS.AR.215Information Security Incident Response
IS.D.OR.225External Reporting of Information Security Events
IS.I.OR.225External Reporting

Governance and Continuous Monitoring(2 mappings)

NISTSP122-8Continuous Monitoring, Training, and Privacy Programme Governance2 targets
IS.D.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
IS.I.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
Coverage crosswalk

A NIST SP 800-122 to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls your existing NIST SP 800-122 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

NIST SP 800-122 into EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation into NIST SP 800-122
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST SP 800-122 to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 25% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-122 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-122 and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?

NIST SP 800-122 has 8 controls across its framework, while EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation covers 34 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Sharing and Transfers, where 1 NIST SP 800-122 controls have no direct EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-122 and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?

Of 8 total NIST SP 800-122 controls, 2 map directly to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls, representing 25% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-122 to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?

6 NIST SP 800-122 controls have no direct equivalent in EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in Sharing and Transfers with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-122 and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?

The domain with the highest gap count is Sharing and Transfers (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.