Cross-Framework Mapping

MITRE ATT&CKvsICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC)

See exactly how MITRE ATT&CK controls map to ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

MITRE ATT&CK maps to ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) with 25% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 MITRE ATT&CK controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Matrices and Platforms - MITRE ATT&CK(1 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Matrices-Enterprise-Mobile-ICS-Cloud-AWS-Azure-Google-Office-365-Container-Platform-SpecificMITRE ATT&CK Matrices + Enterprise + Mobile + ICS + Cloud + AWS + Azure + Google + Office 365 + Container
ICAO-ANX17-Chap2-ThreatAssessment-RiskManagement-Cyber-GASePICAO Annex 17 Chapter 2 - Threat Assessment + Risk Management + Cyber Threats to Critical Aviation Systems (Amendment 17/18)

Techniques and Sub-Techniques - MITRE ATT&CK(1 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Techniques-Sub-Techniques-200-600-T1078-T1059-T1566-T1190-T1486-Procedures-Adversary-BehaviourMITRE ATT&CK Techniques + 200+ + Sub-Techniques + 600+ + T1078 + T1059 + T1566 + T1190 + T1486 + Procedures
ICAO-ANX17-Chap2-ThreatAssessment-RiskManagement-Cyber-GASePICAO Annex 17 Chapter 2 - Threat Assessment + Risk Management + Cyber Threats to Critical Aviation Systems (Amendment 17/18)

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between MITRE ATT&CK and ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC)?

MITRE ATT&CK has 8 controls across its framework, while ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) covers 10 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK, where 1 MITRE ATT&CK controls have no direct ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) equivalent.

How many controls map between MITRE ATT&CK and ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC)?

Of 8 total MITRE ATT&CK controls, 2 map directly to ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping MITRE ATT&CK to ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC)?

6 MITRE ATT&CK controls have no direct equivalent in ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC). The highest concentration of gaps is in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between MITRE ATT&CK and ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.