TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

MITRE ATT&CKvsISO 27043

See exactly how MITRE ATT&CK controls map to ISO 27043. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

24
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
75%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

MITRE ATT&CK maps to ISO 27043 with 75% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 MITRE ATT&CK controls identifies 2 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 24 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Detection Engineering and Data Sources - MITRE ATT&CK(5 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Detection-Data-Sources-Analytics-Sigma-Splunk-KQL-Yara-Snort-SIEM-Hunt-EngineeringMITRE ATT&CK Detection + Data Sources + Analytics + Sigma + Splunk + KQL + Yara + Snort + SIEM + Hunt5 targets
→ISO27043-22Protection from malware
→ISO27043-23Backup and recovery procedures
→ISO27043-24Logging and monitoring
→ISO27043-25Technical vulnerability management
→ISO27043-27Network security management

Matrices and Platforms - MITRE ATT&CK(5 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Matrices-Enterprise-Mobile-ICS-Cloud-AWS-Azure-Google-Office-365-Container-Platform-SpecificMITRE ATT&CK Matrices + Enterprise + Mobile + ICS + Cloud + AWS + Azure + Google + Office 365 + Container5 targets
→ISO27043-11Access control policy and enforcement
→ISO27043-12User access management and provisioning
→ISO27043-13Authentication and password management
→ISO27043-14Privileged access management
→ISO27043-15Access review and recertification

Mitigations and Controls - MITRE ATT&CK(4 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Mitigations-M-IDs-Active-Directory-User-Account-Management-Password-Policies-Network-SegmentationMITRE ATT&CK Mitigations + M-IDs + Active Directory + User Account + Password + Network Segmentation + Application Control4 targets
→ISO27043-17Encryption of data at rest
→ISO27043-18Encryption of data in transit
→ISO27043-19Certificate management
→ISO27043-20Key lifecycle management

Scope and Foundation - MITRE ATT&CK(1 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Scope-Adversarial-Tactics-Techniques-MITRE-Corporation-2013-v15-v16-Enterprise-Mobile-ICS-CloudMITRE ATT&CK Scope + MITRE Corporation 2013 + v15 + v16 + Enterprise + Mobile + ICS + Cloud + Container
→ISO27043-04Roles and responsibilities definition

Tactics - MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Kill Chain(3 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Tactics-14-Enterprise-Kill-Chain-Reconnaissance-Initial-Access-Discovery-Lateral-Movement-ImpactMITRE ATT&CK 14 Enterprise Tactics + Reconnaissance + Initial Access + Discovery + Lateral Movement + Impact3 targets
→ISO27043-06Asset inventory and ownership
→ISO27043-08Information classification and labeling
→ISO27043-10Media management and disposal

Techniques and Sub-Techniques - MITRE ATT&CK(2 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Techniques-Sub-Techniques-200-600-T1078-T1059-T1566-T1190-T1486-Procedures-Adversary-BehaviourMITRE ATT&CK Techniques + 200+ + Sub-Techniques + 600+ + T1078 + T1059 + T1566 + T1190 + T1486 + Procedures2 targets
→ISO27043-06Asset inventory and ownership
→ISO27043-08Information classification and labeling

+4 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other MITRE ATT&CK comparisons

MITRE ATT&CK vs OWASP MASVS6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs OWASP ASVS6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs MITRE D3FEND6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs ISO/SAE 214346 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.06 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs OWASP Top 10:20255 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)5 mappings

Other ISO 27043 comparisons

SLSA vs ISO 2704318 mappingsSIG (Shared Assessments) vs ISO 2704318 mappingsPTES vs ISO 2704318 mappingsOWASP SAMM vs ISO 2704318 mappingsOWASP MASVS vs ISO 2704318 mappingsOpenSSF Scorecard vs ISO 2704318 mappingsNIST SP 800-92 vs ISO 2704318 mappingsNIST SP 800-88 vs ISO 2704318 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between MITRE ATT&CK and ISO 27043?

MITRE ATT&CK has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO 27043 covers 52 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (75% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK, where 1 MITRE ATT&CK controls have no direct ISO 27043 equivalent.

How many controls map between MITRE ATT&CK and ISO 27043?

Of 8 total MITRE ATT&CK controls, 6 map directly to ISO 27043 controls — representing 75% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping MITRE ATT&CK to ISO 27043?

2 MITRE ATT&CK controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27043. The highest concentration of gaps is in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between MITRE ATT&CK and ISO 27043?

The domain with the highest gap count is Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.