TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

MITRE ATT&CKvsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)

See exactly how MITRE ATT&CK controls map to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

MITRE ATT&CK maps to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 MITRE ATT&CK controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Detection Engineering and Data Sources - MITRE ATT&CK(3 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Detection-Data-Sources-Analytics-Sigma-Splunk-KQL-Yara-Snort-SIEM-Hunt-EngineeringMITRE ATT&CK Detection + Data Sources + Analytics + Sigma + Splunk + KQL + Yara + Snort + SIEM + Hunt3 targets
→CAT-D3-1Preventative controls
→CAT-D3-2Detective controls
→CAT-D3-3Corrective controls

Matrices and Platforms - MITRE ATT&CK(3 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Matrices-Enterprise-Mobile-ICS-Cloud-AWS-Azure-Google-Office-365-Container-Platform-SpecificMITRE ATT&CK Matrices + Enterprise + Mobile + ICS + Cloud + AWS + Azure + Google + Office 365 + Container3 targets
→CAT-D3-1Preventative controls
→CAT-D4-3Third-party access controls
→CAT-IRP-4Organizational characteristics

Techniques and Sub-Techniques - MITRE ATT&CK(2 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Techniques-Sub-Techniques-200-600-T1078-T1059-T1566-T1190-T1486-Procedures-Adversary-BehaviourMITRE ATT&CK Techniques + 200+ + Sub-Techniques + 600+ + T1078 + T1059 + T1566 + T1190 + T1486 + Procedures2 targets
→CAT-D3-1Preventative controls
→CAT-D4-3Third-party access controls

Related Comparisons

Other MITRE ATT&CK comparisons

MITRE ATT&CK vs OWASP MASVS6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs OWASP ASVS6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs MITRE D3FEND6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs ISO 270436 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs ISO/SAE 214346 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.06 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs ISO 134855 mappings

Other FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) comparisons

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)12 mappingsO-RAN WG11 Security Specification vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)11 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)11 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)10 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)10 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)10 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)9 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)9 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between MITRE ATT&CK and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?

MITRE ATT&CK has 8 controls across its framework, while FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK, where 1 MITRE ATT&CK controls have no direct FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) equivalent.

How many controls map between MITRE ATT&CK and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?

Of 8 total MITRE ATT&CK controls, 3 map directly to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping MITRE ATT&CK to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?

5 MITRE ATT&CK controls have no direct equivalent in FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT). The highest concentration of gaps is in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between MITRE ATT&CK and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.