O-RAN WG11 Security SpecificationvsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)
See exactly how O-RAN WG11 Security Specification controls map to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
O-RAN WG11 Security Specification maps to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 O-RAN WG11 Security Specification controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Supply Chain, SDLC, Privacy, Trust.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.
Threat Model and Risk Management(6 mappings)
O-RAN Interface Security(4 mappings)
Logging, Monitoring, IR, DoS(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other O-RAN WG11 Security Specification comparisons
Other FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 723 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between O-RAN WG11 Security Specification and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?
O-RAN WG11 Security Specification has 8 controls across its framework, while FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Supply Chain, SDLC, Privacy, Trust, where 1 O-RAN WG11 Security Specification controls have no direct FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) equivalent.
How many controls map between O-RAN WG11 Security Specification and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?
Of 8 total O-RAN WG11 Security Specification controls, 3 map directly to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping O-RAN WG11 Security Specification to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?
5 O-RAN WG11 Security Specification controls have no direct equivalent in FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT). The highest concentration of gaps is in Supply Chain, SDLC, Privacy, Trust with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between O-RAN WG11 Security Specification and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Supply Chain, SDLC, Privacy, Trust (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.