TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)

See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

21
Controls Mapped
85
Gaps Found
13%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) with 13% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 92 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in GV - Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 318K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 21 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 318K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

DE - Detect(3 mappings)

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-07Cyber threat intelligence and contextual information are integrated into analysis3 targets
→CAT-D2-1Threat intelligence
→CAT-D2-2Monitoring and analyzing
→CAT-IRP-5External threats

GV - Govern(6 mappings)

NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk2 targets
→CAT-D1-2Risk management
→CAT-ML-2Evolving
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established2 targets
→CAT-D1-2Risk management
→CAT-ML-2Evolving
NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established2 targets
→CAT-D1-2Risk management
→CAT-ML-2Evolving

ID - Identify(4 mappings)

NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans are established and maintained
→CAT-D5-1Incident planning and strategy
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-02Cyber threat intelligence is received from information sharing forums3 targets
→CAT-D2-1Threat intelligence
→CAT-D2-2Monitoring and analyzing
→CAT-IRP-5External threats

PR - Protect(6 mappings)

NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed
→CAT-IRP-4Organizational characteristics
NIST-CSF-PR.DS-10The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-use are protected
→CAT-D5-4Resilience planning and testing
NIST-CSF-PR.IR-03Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and adverse situations
→CAT-D5-4Resilience planning and testing
NIST-CSF-PR.IR-04Adequate resource capacity to ensure availability is maintained
→CAT-D5-4Resilience planning and testing
NIST-CSF-PR.PS-01Configuration management practices are established and applied
→CAT-D3-3Corrective controls
NIST-CSF-PR.PS-04Log records are generated and made available for continuous monitoring
→CAT-D3-2Detective controls

RC - Recover(1 mappings)

NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed
→CAT-D5-1Incident planning and strategy

+1 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 700 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ISO 27001:202282 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Belgium CyberFundamentals32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASEAN Data Management Framework25 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Azure Security Benchmark22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)19 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)19 mappings

Other FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) comparisons

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)12 mappingsRBI Cybersecurity Framework for Banks vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)11 mappingsO-RAN WG11 Security Specification vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)11 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)11 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)10 mappingsTISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)10 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)10 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)9 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 700 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (318K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 106 controls across its framework, while FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (13% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GV - Govern, where 25 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?

Of 106 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 14 map directly to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls — representing 13% coverage. The remaining 92 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?

92 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT). The highest concentration of gaps is in GV - Govern with 25 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?

The domain with the highest gap count is GV - Govern (25 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.