TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal DatavsIndiana Consumer Data Protection Act

See exactly how Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data controls map to Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
62%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data maps to Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act with 62% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Database Registration + SIC + Superintendencia de Bancos.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Cross-Border + Vendor Mgmt + Marketing + Article 80(1 mappings)

DOM172-Cross-Border-Transfer-Article-80-Vendor-Processor-Management-Marketing-Direct-Communications-Article-23-24-26Dominican Republic Law 172-13 Cross-Border Transfer + Vendor Management + Marketing + Articles 23-24-26-80
→INCDPA-Processor-Contracts-DPA-Subprocessor-Audit-Confidentiality-EndOfContractIndiana CDPA Processor Contracts - Data Processing Agreement (DPA) + Required Provisions + Subprocessor Approval + Confidentiality + End of Contract Deletion + Audit Rights + Assistance

ARCO Rights + Habeas Data + Article 70 Constitution(1 mappings)

DOM172-Data-Subject-ARCO-Rights-Habeas-Data-Action-Constitutional-Article-70-Access-Rectification-Cancellation-OppositionDominican Republic Law 172-13 ARCO Rights + Habeas Data Action + Constitutional Article 70
→INCDPA-ConsumerRights-Access-Correction-Deletion-Portability-OptOut-TargetedAd-Sale-Profiling-Appeal-45DayIndiana CDPA Consumer Rights - Access + Correction + Deletion + Portability + Opt-Out of Targeted Advertising/Sale/Profiling + 45-Day Response + 45-Day Extension + Authorised Agent + Appeal Process

Lawful Basis + Consent + Notice + Article 4-12(1 mappings)

DOM172-Lawful-Basis-Consent-Notice-Information-Duty-Articles-4-12-Quality-Principle-Purpose-Limitation-MinimisationDominican Republic Law 172-13 Lawful Basis + Consent + Notice + Information Duty + Articles 4-12
→INCDPA-Controller-PrivacyNotice-PurposeLimitation-DataMinimisation-Transparency-LawfulBasisIndiana CDPA Controller Obligations - Privacy Notice + Purpose Limitation + Data Minimisation + Transparency + Lawful Basis + Reasonable + Adequate + Relevant + Limited to What is Necessary

Security + Article 25 + Breach Notification + Article 22(1 mappings)

DOM172-Security-Measures-Article-25-Encryption-Pseudonymization-Access-Control-Incident-Handling-Breach-Notification-Article-22Dominican Republic Law 172-13 Security Measures + Article 25 + Encryption + Breach Notification
→INCDPA-Security-ReasonablePractices-Breach-Notification-Records-Encryption-PseudonymisationIndiana CDPA Security + Reasonable Practices + Breach Notification + Indiana Breach Notification Law (IC 24-4.9) + Records + Encryption + Pseudonymisation + De-Identification

Supervisory + Sanctions + Governance + Modernisation 2024(5 mappings)

DOM172-Supervisory-Authority-Cooperation-Sanctions-Penalties-Articles-77-79-Awareness-Training-Retention-DPO-DesignationDominican Republic Law 172-13 Supervisory Authority + Sanctions + Articles 77-79 + DPO + Awareness5 targets
→INCDPA-Controller-PrivacyNotice-PurposeLimitation-DataMinimisation-Transparency-LawfulBasisIndiana CDPA Controller Obligations - Privacy Notice + Purpose Limitation + Data Minimisation + Transparency + Lawful Basis + Reasonable + Adequate + Relevant + Limited to What is Necessary
→INCDPA-Enforcement-30DayCure-AttorneyGeneralOnly-NoPrivateRight-CivilPenalties-7500-PerViolationIndiana CDPA Enforcement - Attorney General Exclusive + 30-Day Cure Period + No Private Right of Action + Civil Penalties Up to USD 7500 Per Violation + Investigation + Compliance
→INCDPA-Processor-Contracts-DPA-Subprocessor-Audit-Confidentiality-EndOfContractIndiana CDPA Processor Contracts - Data Processing Agreement (DPA) + Required Provisions + Subprocessor Approval + Confidentiality + End of Contract Deletion + Audit Rights + Assistance
→INCDPA-Security-ReasonablePractices-Breach-Notification-Records-Encryption-PseudonymisationIndiana CDPA Security + Reasonable Practices + Breach Notification + Indiana Breach Notification Law (IC 24-4.9) + Records + Encryption + Pseudonymisation + De-Identification
→INCDPA-SensitiveData-Children-Consent-COPPA-DataProtectionAssessment-DPIAIndiana CDPA Sensitive Data + Consent for Sensitive Categories + Children Under 13 + COPPA Coordination + Data Protection Assessment (DPA) + High-Risk Processing

Related Comparisons

Other Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data comparisons

Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)5 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs Pakistan Personal Data Protection Bill 20235 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs Bahrain PDPL5 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs Jamaica Data Protection Act 20205 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL)5 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act5 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act5 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)5 mappings

Other Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act comparisons

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act6 mappingsLey Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) vs Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act6 mappingsIowa Consumer Data Protection Act vs Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act6 mappingsIndonesia PDP Law vs Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act6 mappingsBahrain PDPL vs Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act6 mappingsIceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) vs Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act6 mappingsFederal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL) vs Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act6 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data and Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act?

Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data has 8 controls across its framework, while Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Database Registration + SIC + Superintendencia de Bancos, where 1 Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data controls have no direct Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act equivalent.

How many controls map between Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data and Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act?

Of 8 total Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data controls, 5 map directly to Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data to Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act?

3 Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data controls have no direct equivalent in Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act. The highest concentration of gaps is in Database Registration + SIC + Superintendencia de Bancos with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data and Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act?

The domain with the highest gap count is Database Registration + SIC + Superintendencia de Bancos (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.