Cross-Framework Mapping

Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal DatavsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia)

See exactly how Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data controls map to Privacy Act 1988 (Australia). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

30
Controls Mapped
19
Gaps Found
29%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data maps to Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) with 29% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data controls identifies 35 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Dominican Republic DPL: Data Subject Rights.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 715 frameworks | 414K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 30 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 414K+ mappings across 715 frameworks.

Dominican Republic DPL: Data Collection & Consent(9 mappings)

DO-DPL-02Consent management and withdrawal3 targets
APA-13Encryption of personal data
APA-15Access control for personal data
APA-16Data breach notification requirements
DO-DPL-04Purpose limitation and specification3 targets
APA-13Encryption of personal data
APA-15Access control for personal data
APA-16Data breach notification requirements
DO-DPL-05Data minimization requirements3 targets
APA-13Encryption of personal data
APA-15Access control for personal data
APA-16Data breach notification requirements

Dominican Republic DPL: Data Subject Rights(1 mappings)

DO-DPL-09Right to data portability
APA-09Right to data portability

Dominican Republic DPL: Data Security(7 mappings)

DO-DPL-13Encryption of personal data
APA-13Encryption of personal data
DO-DPL-15Access control for personal data
APA-15Access control for personal data
DO-DPL-16Data breach notification requirements2 targets
APA-16Data breach notification requirements
APA-17Security incident response procedures
DO-DPL-17Security incident response procedures2 targets
APA-16Data breach notification requirements
APA-17Security incident response procedures
DO-DPL-18Regular security testing and assessment
APA-18Regular security testing and assessment

Dominican Republic DPL: Data Governance(3 mappings)

DO-DPL-19Data protection officer designation3 targets
APA-19Data protection officer designation
APA-21Data protection impact assessments
APA-22Privacy by design and default

+10 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 715 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 715 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 715 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (414K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data and Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)?

Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data has 49 controls across its framework, while Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) covers 48 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Dominican Republic DPL: Data Subject Rights, where 6 Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data controls have no direct Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) equivalent.

How many controls map between Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data and Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)?

Of 49 total Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data controls, 14 map directly to Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls — representing 29% coverage. The remaining 35 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data to Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)?

35 Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data controls have no direct equivalent in Privacy Act 1988 (Australia). The highest concentration of gaps is in Dominican Republic DPL: Data Subject Rights with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data and Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Dominican Republic DPL: Data Subject Rights (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.