Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27011:2024vsSIG (Shared Assessments)

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls map to SIG (Shared Assessments). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
31
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 maps to SIG (Shared Assessments) with 25% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Technological.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework(3 mappings)

27011-1Scope
SHAREASSESS-1Information Governance and Risk
27011-3Terms and definitions
SHAREASSESS-1Information Governance and Risk
27400-3Terms and definitions
SHAREASSESS-1Information Governance and Risk

Clause 5: Organizational Controls for Telecommunications(1 mappings)

27011-5.3Segregation of duties
SHAREASSESS-2Access Control, Identity, Authentication

People(1 mappings)

27011-6.3Awareness and Training
SHAREASSESS-4Vulnerability Management, Patching, Application Security

Clause 6: People Controls for Telecommunications(1 mappings)

27011-6.3Awareness and Training
SHAREASSESS-4Vulnerability Management, Patching, Application Security

Technological(1 mappings)

27011-8.1User Endpoint Devices
SHAREASSESS-2Access Control, Identity, Authentication

Clause 8: Technological Controls for Telecommunications(6 mappings)

27011-8.1User Endpoint Devices
SHAREASSESS-2Access Control, Identity, Authentication
27011-8.2Network security and segregation
SHAREASSESS-4Vulnerability Management, Patching, Application Security
27011-8.3Cryptography and key management
SHAREASSESS-3Network Security, Endpoint, Data Protection
27011-8.4Logging and monitoring
SHAREASSESS-4Vulnerability Management, Patching, Application Security
27011-8.5Vulnerability and malware management
SHAREASSESS-4Vulnerability Management, Patching, Application Security
27011-8.6Data protection and backup
SHAREASSESS-4Vulnerability Management, Patching, Application Security

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and SIG (Shared Assessments)?

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 has 44 controls across its framework, while SIG (Shared Assessments) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Technological, where 10 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct SIG (Shared Assessments) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and SIG (Shared Assessments)?

Of 44 total ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls, 13 map directly to SIG (Shared Assessments) controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27011:2024 to SIG (Shared Assessments)?

37 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct equivalent in SIG (Shared Assessments). The highest concentration of gaps is in Technological with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and SIG (Shared Assessments)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Technological (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.