Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27011:2024vsO-RAN WG11 Security Specification

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls map to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
25
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 maps to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification with 25% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Technological.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework(9 mappings)

27011-1Scope3 targets
ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
ORANWG11-3Cryptography, TLS, SSH, IPsec, and PKI Lifecycle Management
ORANWG11-6Security Test Specifications, Certification, and Conformance
27011-3Terms and definitions3 targets
ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
ORANWG11-3Cryptography, TLS, SSH, IPsec, and PKI Lifecycle Management
ORANWG11-6Security Test Specifications, Certification, and Conformance
27400-3Terms and definitions3 targets
ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
ORANWG11-3Cryptography, TLS, SSH, IPsec, and PKI Lifecycle Management
ORANWG11-6Security Test Specifications, Certification, and Conformance

Clause 5: Organizational Controls for Telecommunications(2 mappings)

27011-5.3Segregation of duties
ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
27011-5.4Threat intelligence for telecom
ORANWG11-1O-RAN Threat Model, Risk Management, and Security Architecture

People(1 mappings)

27011-6.3Awareness and Training
ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul

Clause 6: People Controls for Telecommunications(1 mappings)

27011-6.3Awareness and Training
ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul

Technological(1 mappings)

27011-8.1User Endpoint Devices
ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul

Clause 8: Technological Controls for Telecommunications(5 mappings)

27011-8.1User Endpoint Devices
ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
27011-8.2Network security and segregation
ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
27011-8.3Cryptography and key management
ORANWG11-3Cryptography, TLS, SSH, IPsec, and PKI Lifecycle Management
27011-8.4Logging and monitoring
ORANWG11-7Logging, Monitoring, Incident Response, and Denial-of-Service Resilience
27011-8.5Vulnerability and malware management
ORANWG11-1O-RAN Threat Model, Risk Management, and Security Architecture

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 706 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 has 44 controls across its framework, while O-RAN WG11 Security Specification covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Technological, where 10 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct O-RAN WG11 Security Specification equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

Of 44 total ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls, 13 map directly to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27011:2024 to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

37 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct equivalent in O-RAN WG11 Security Specification. The highest concentration of gaps is in Technological with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

The domain with the highest gap count is Technological (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.