TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 234vsO-RAN WG11 Security Specification

See exactly how APRA CPS 234 controls map to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
19
Gaps Found
29%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 234 maps to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification with 29% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 APRA CPS 234 controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in APRA CPS 234: Incident Management & Reporting.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 8 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

APRA CPS 234: Information Security Governance(3 mappings)

CPS234-05Roles and responsibilities definition3 targets
→ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
→ORANWG11-3Cryptography, TLS, SSH, IPsec, and PKI Lifecycle Management
→ORANWG11-6Security Test Specifications, Certification, and Conformance

APRA CPS 234: Cybersecurity Controls(3 mappings)

CPS234-06Network security and segmentation
→ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
CPS234-08Application security controls
→ORANWG11-8Supply Chain, Secure Development Lifecycle, Privacy, Multi-Vendor Trust
CPS234-09Encryption and key management
→ORANWG11-3Cryptography, TLS, SSH, IPsec, and PKI Lifecycle Management

APRA CPS 234: Operational Resilience(3 mappings)

CPS234-11Business continuity planning and testing
→ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
CPS234-14Roles and Responsibilities
→ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
CPS234-15Information Security Capability
→ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul

Governance(1 mappings)

CPS234-14Roles and Responsibilities
→ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul

Capability(1 mappings)

CPS234-15Information Security Capability
→ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul

Third Party(1 mappings)

CPS234-16Capability of Third Parties
→ORANWG11-1O-RAN Threat Model, Risk Management, and Security Architecture

APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management(3 mappings)

CPS234-16Capability of Third Parties
→ORANWG11-1O-RAN Threat Model, Risk Management, and Security Architecture
CPS234-18Ongoing monitoring and assessment
→ORANWG11-1O-RAN Threat Model, Risk Management, and Security Architecture
CPS234-20Information Asset Identification and Classification
→ORANWG11-1O-RAN Threat Model, Risk Management, and Security Architecture

Asset Management(1 mappings)

CPS234-20Information Asset Identification and Classification
→ORANWG11-1O-RAN Threat Model, Risk Management, and Security Architecture

Related Comparisons

Other APRA CPS 234 comparisons

APRA CPS 234 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 525 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs PSD2 SCA16 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs OSFI B-1316 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs Open Banking Security16 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines16 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs HKMA SPM16 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs GLBA16 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs PCI SSF16 mappings

Other O-RAN WG11 Security Specification comparisons

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification6 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification6 mappingsOpen Banking Security vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification5 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification5 mappingsFFIEC IT Examination Handbook vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification5 mappingsISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification5 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification5 mappingsOWASP MASVS vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 234 and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

APRA CPS 234 has 35 controls across its framework, while O-RAN WG11 Security Specification covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in APRA CPS 234: Incident Management & Reporting, where 5 APRA CPS 234 controls have no direct O-RAN WG11 Security Specification equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 234 and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

Of 35 total APRA CPS 234 controls, 14 map directly to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification controls — representing 29% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 234 to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

31 APRA CPS 234 controls have no direct equivalent in O-RAN WG11 Security Specification. The highest concentration of gaps is in APRA CPS 234: Incident Management & Reporting with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 234 and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

The domain with the highest gap count is APRA CPS 234: Incident Management & Reporting (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.