Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27011:2024vsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

27
Controls Mapped
17
Gaps Found
27%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 27% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Technological.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 27 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework(9 mappings)

27011-1Scope3 targets
3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists
FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
27011-3Terms and definitions3 targets
3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists
FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
27400-3Terms and definitions3 targets
3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists
FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup

Clause 5: Organizational Controls for Telecommunications(4 mappings)

27011-5.3Segregation of duties
3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit
27011-5.6Supplier relationships and telecom supply chain3 targets
3.16System and Services Acquisition
3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
3.5Securely Dispose of Data

People(1 mappings)

27011-6.3Awareness and Training
3.2.1Account data storage minimised

Clause 6: People Controls for Telecommunications(1 mappings)

27011-6.3Awareness and Training
3.2.1Account data storage minimised

Clause 7: Physical Controls for Telecommunications(2 mappings)

27011-7.1Physical security perimeters
3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit
27011-7.3Equipment protection
3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit

Technological(2 mappings)

27011-8.1User Endpoint Devices2 targets
3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit
3.7.1Key generation procedures

Clause 8: Technological Controls for Telecommunications(1 mappings)

27011-8.1User Endpoint Devices
3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit

+7 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 706 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 706 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 has 44 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (27% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Technological, where 10 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 44 total ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls, 14 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 27% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27011:2024 to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

36 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Technological with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Technological (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.